We study restricted-link augmentation to $2$-vertex-connectivity. An instance consists of a graph $G$, possibly disconnected, a set $L$ of admissible links on its vertices, integer link costs in $\{1,\dots,W\}$, and an integer $k$; the task is to add at most $k$ links of minimum total cost so that the resulting multigraph is $2$-vertex-connected. Recent work gives $O^*(k^{O(k)})$-time algorithms for unweighted $\lambda$-vertex-connectivity augmentation for every $\lambda\leq 4$ [Carmesin and Ramanujan, SODA 2026], and an $O^*((k+\lambda)^{O(k)})$-time algorithm for arbitrary $\lambda$ [Korhonen and Thorup, arXiv 2026]. We give a deterministic algorithm with running time $O^*(36^kW)$. Thus, for $\lambda=2$, the unweighted running time improves from $O^*(k^{O(k)})$ to $O^*(36^k)$, and the algorithm also handles link costs with pseudo-polynomial dependence on $W$. We reduce the problem to a boundary-pair variant of $2$-vertex-connected spanning subgraph, where each vertex is assigned a pair of incident edges with an associated pair cost. We solve this variant using a cancellation identity, inspired by Cut&Count [Cygan et al., TALG 2022], obtained by applying M\"obius inversion to decompositions along cut vertices: the identity cancels every connected spanning graph with more than one block and keeps exactly the $2$-vertex-connected spanning graphs.
We study the parameterized complexity of Induced Subgraph Isomorphism (ISI) and Maximum Common Induced Subgraph (MCIS) with respect to the cluster vertex deletion number $k$. For ISI, we give a randomized $O^*(k^{O(k)})$-time algorithm, showing that ISI is fixed-parameter tractable under this parameter and resolving an open question of Hanaka et al. [WALCOM 2026]. Our algorithm is optimal under the Exponential Time Hypothesis (ETH), and is based on a reduction to Exact Multicolored Matching solvable via algebraic techniques. For MCIS, we present a randomized $O^*(2^{O(k^2)})$-time algorithm via a reduction to a weighted variant of Exact Multicolored Matching, and we prove a matching ETH-based lower bound by showing that a $k$-by-$k$ binary matrix feasibility problem with list-constrained rows and columns admits no $O^*(2^{o(k^2)})$-time algorithm, which may be of independent interest. These results reveal that, in this setting, MCIS is strictly harder than ISI. Finally, for the three-graph variant 3-MCIS, we show that it becomes NP-hard already when each input graph has cluster vertex deletion number 2.
Tomohiro Koana, Soh Kumabe, Y. Otachi· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.