Differentially private (DP) fine-tuning methods treat sparse Mixture-of-Experts (MoE) models as a single dense block, ignoring that shared layers see all data while experts only see routed records. We identify and formally characterize three resulting failure modes: global clipping suppresses expert gradients, batch-level normalization dilutes sparse expert updates, and fixed privacy noise degrades signal-to-noise ratio on low-load experts. We introduce RAPTOR - a Role-Aware Private Training framework, which alternates shared and expert optimization and targets each failure directly, using expert-specific clipping and noise together with a public expected-owner denominator and a count-independent update schedule that avoids conditioning on private, realized expert counts. We prove the resulting mechanism satisfies $(\varepsilon,\delta)$-DP: because each record is assigned to exactly one owner expert, per-expert mechanisms within a layer compose in parallel, so updating all $E$ experts costs no more, in privacy terms, than updating one, with shared and expert streams composing sequentially across training. We further derive a bias-variance decomposition of the public-denominator estimator showing its bias grows predictably with routing imbalance, yielding a privacy-free rule for selecting which layer to protect from routing entropy measured on a small public corpus. Experiments on Switch Transformer and OLMoE fine-tuning across GLUE tasks, and on DeepSeek-VL2-Tiny, show consistent gains over standard DP baselines across several privacy levels ($\varepsilon$), with the largest margins typically at the tightest budgets. Code and models are publicly available: https://github.com/leduckhai/RAPTOR
Duc Dm, Khai Le-Duc, D. Nguyen et al.· 0 citations
Cue-induced bias is best understood not as a single flaw in LLMs but as a family of causally effective linear directions that are largely shaped by alignment tuning.
Prakhar Gupta, Terry Jingchen Zhang, Florent Draye et al.· arXiv.org· 1 citation
Evaluating three frontier models across six games in homogeneous and heterogeneous groups over 10 rounds, it is found that different models interpret announcements incompatibly, some as binding commitments and others as cheap talk, producing payoff gaps that emerge in Round~0 and persist across all 10 rounds.
Jerick Shi, Terry Jingchen Zhang, Bernhard Scholkopf et al.· 0 citations
Concept-Targeted Attribution (CTA) provides a framework for moving from behavioral probe accuracy to mechanistic explanations of probe performance, enabling more detailed audits of internal concept representations, including safety-critical ones.
V. Palit, Florent Draye, Terry Jingchen Zhang et al.· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.