This paper presents a conceptual design for a proactive human assisting robot system capable of recognizing human activities and responding proactively. The system leverages contextual human activity recognition to interpret human actions across diverse contexts, while behavior trees are utilized to define dynamic and interpretable robot behaviors. We outline the system architecture, incorporating contextual human action recognition (HAR), behavior trees (BTs), and ROS, using the Spot robot platform as a representative example. We explain how HAR enables the robot to provide proactive assistance, discuss its limitations, and introduce methodologies for contextual HAR to address these limitations, thereby enhancing the robot's decision-making in complex human activity scenarios.
Service robots often receive natural language instructions in changing workspaces where multiple visible objects may match one description. Relying on detector confidence, random selection, or direct vision–language model (VLM) prediction can lead to a wrong action. This paper presents ActivAsk, a zero-shot framework for resolving referential ambiguity before robotic grasping. ActivAsk constructs open-vocabulary candidates from red-green-blue-depth (RGB-D) input, asks candidate-grounded yes/no questions when needed, updates the candidate state from the user’s answer, and grasps after target resolution. It selects among VLM-proposed candidate partitions using an expected free energy (EFE) criterion motivated by active inference; with neutral response preferences, this reduces to information gain over candidate partitions. Offline experiments showed that interactive clarification improved target accuracy from about 53–54% for noninteractive baselines to about 90–92%. ActivAsk matched the best interactive accuracy (92.13%) while asking 15.47–19.71% fewer questions on asked trials and 21.43–23.88% fewer for ambiguous instructions. In online real robot experiments, ActivAsk achieved 92.98% target selection accuracy and 87.72% full correct object grasp success; unresolved or wrong targets were not physically executed after operator-controlled verification and were counted as task failures.
Haoandong Yang, Gabriel W. Haddon-Hill, Teresa Zielińska et al.· Robotics· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.
