Study Design Retrospective cohort study. Purpose To compare three cervical sarcopenia metrics and frailty as preoperative predictors of unfavorable postoperative outcomes following surgical fixation of odontoid fractures. Overview of Literature Sarcopenia is increasingly recognized as an indicator of physiologic vulnerability in spine surgery and thoracolumbar trauma. However, its prognostic significance in odontoid fractures remains unclear, and no previous study has directly compared cervical sarcopenia measurement sites in this population. Methods Adult patients who underwent surgical fixation of traumatic odontoid fractures at a single level I trauma center were retrospectively reviewed. Sarcopenia was quantified on perioperative computed tomography using sternocleidomastoid, prevertebral, and paraspinal cross-sectional area normalized to the C3 vertebral body area. Frailty was assessed using the 5-factor modified frailty index (mFI-5), with hypertension status confirmed through a review of prescribed medications. Associations with postoperative outcomes were evaluated using threshold-based analyses, intercorrelation testing, subgroup analysis of combined low-sarcopenia/high-frailty patients, and an exploratory Combined Sarcopenia-Frailty Score. Results This study included 61 patients (mean age, 61.7 years; 50.8% female). The three sarcopenia metrics were only modestly intercorrelated (Spearman rho, 0.34–0.47), with 46.7%–53.3% overlap among patients in the most sarcopenic quartiles. No individual sarcopenia or mFI-5 threshold independently predicted postoperative outcomes. However, patients in the most sarcopenic quartile on any cervical metric with an mFI-5 ≥2 (n=11) experienced higher rates of mortality, urinary tract infection, pneumonia, and nonunion. In exploratory receiver operating characteristic analysis, the Combined Sarcopenia-Frailty Score exhibited moderate discrimination for significant adverse events, with an area under the curve of 0.73 and an optimal threshold of ≥9. Conclusions Cervical sarcopenia and frailty were not independently associated with adverse outcomes following odontoid fracture fixation. However, their combination identified patients at substantially higher risk for mortality, complications, and nonunion, supporting a potential role for combined preoperative risk stratification (Level of Evidence: level III).
Sapan Patel, Hershil Patel, R. Suresh et al.· Asian Spine Journal· 0 citations
STUDY DESIGN
Retrospective cohort study.
OBJECTIVE
To evaluate the impact of prior fragility fractures on complications following anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF).
SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA
Fragility fractures indicate poor bone quality and increased comorbidities, potentially elevating surgical risks. Understanding the risks is critical for optimizing outcomes in ACDF patients.
METHODS
Patients undergoing a primary ACDF within 3 years of a fragility fracture were identified from 2013 to 2022. A control cohort without prior fragility fractures was matched 1:1. Exclusion criteria included traumatic fractures, prior revision ACDFs, and active spine infections. Outcomes assessed included 90-day medical and surgical complications, 30-day and 90-day emergency visits and readmission rates, and 2-year complications, including mortality. Statistical analyses included the Pearson χ² test, the Welch t test, and the multivariate logistic regression.
RESULTS
A total of 1236 patients were matched in each cohort. Prior fragility fractures were associated with higher risks of medical complications, such as atelectasis (4.4% vs. 1.7%, OR: 2.83, P<0.001), respiratory failure (5.0% vs. 2.3%, OR: 2.36, P<0.001), pleural effusion (3.6% vs. 0.9%, OR: 4.35, P<0.001), and urinary tract infections (9.3% vs. 4.5%, OR: 2.20, P<0.001). Surgical complications were also more frequent, including dysphagia (7.0% vs. 4.0%, OR: 1.81, P=0.001), spinal cord deficit (5.0% vs. 2.1%, OR: 27.46, P<0.001), and deep wound infection (1.2% vs. 0.4%, OR: 3.07, P<0.031). Subsequent fragility fractures at 2 years were significantly higher in patients who had a history of fragility fracture (29.0% vs. 4.4%, OR: 10.18, P<0.001), as were 30-day (12.5% vs. 7.3%, OR: 1.87, P<0.001) and 90-day (16.8% vs. 10.3%, OR: 1.82, P<0.001) readmission rates.
CONCLUSIONS
Patients with a history of fragility fractures undergoing ACDF experience significantly higher rates of postoperative complications and readmission rates.
Muhammad Zulfiqar, Ved A. Vengsarkar, Elizabeth K. Driskill et al.· Clinical Spine Surgery· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.