Skip to content

2 papers indexed here

We haven’t gathered this author’s papers yet. Follow them and we’ll fetch their work.

Not the right person? Other researchers publish under this name.

Preprint Aug 2026

Geometry versus excitation sector in the decoherence of asymmetric $N$-qubit $W$ states

We investigate how network geometry and excitation sector separately control pairwise entanglement decay in asymmetric multipartite $W$ states. To disentangle these effects, we introduce an analytically tractable $N$-qubit generalization of the asymmetric Lohmayer geometry and its complementary-excitation partner, yielding inequivalent vertex-base (VB) and base-base (BB) pair classes that can be compared directly with symmetric $W$-state references. We derive closed-form concurrence dynamics under representative one-sided noise models and find that, within either excitation sector, the VB concurrence has exactly the same noise dependence as the corresponding symmetric reference, preserving a noise-independent proportional advantage wherever both remain entangled. The amplitude-damping reordering previously identified for the three-qubit Lohmayer state is therefore a cross-sector effect rather than an intrinsic fragility of the VB geometry. In contrast, the BB pair exhibits a genuine same-sector structural fragility, with lower entanglement-sudden-death thresholds than the VB pair under depolarizing noise and, in the $(N-1)$-excitation sector, under amplitude damping. The results establish network geometry, excitation sector, and noise symmetry as distinct ingredients governing pairwise entanglement robustness in asymmetric quantum networks.

S. Bhattacharyya, Sovik Roy, Fatih Ozaydin · 0 citations
Preprint Aug 2026

Knot your average qutrit: Measurement-induced entanglement splitting and the cabling dictionary for GHZ and W States

Multipartite entanglement is conventionally classified by state families viz. family of GHZ and W class of states, with each family expected to behave differently under measurement. We show that, at least for the question of how entanglement splits after a single-particle measurement, this is not the division that matters for qutrits. Extending the Aravind's correspondence (which models entanglement as topological linking, and projective measurement as physically cutting a ring from an interlinked configuration\cite{aravind1997}) from qubits to qutrits, we derive the complete measurement-induced entanglement splitting of the GHZ type qutrit state i.e |GHZ_3>and of the full family of symmetric W class qutrit states, six two same - one different states i.e |{W_{p,p,q}^{sym}}>and one all - different state i.e. |W_{0,1,2}>, under both the computational basis (CB) and the mutually unbiased bases (MUBs), obtaining exact eigenvalues and Schmidt ranks for every outcome in every case. We see that the |W_{0,1,2}>state behaves similarly as |GHZ_3>state, a single, outcome-independent residual rank in each basis, while the |{W_{p,p,q}^{sym}>states alone show probability-weighted, outcome-dependent behaviour. The relevant structural line is therefore repeated-index versus all-different-index bag structure, not GHZ class versus $W$ class. We express this classification using a \textit{two-strand cabling} extension of Aravind's \textit{ring-and-link} picture. This is needed because the qutrit residual Schmidt rank (R) takes three values, R belonging to {1,2,3}, rather than the qubit binary (i.e. R belonging to {1,2}). We are explicit throughout that this cabling dictionary is a labeling convention built to reproduce an independently computed Schmidt rank, not a topological invariant derived from the link diagrams themselves, and we discuss what would be needed to close that gap

S. Bhattacharyya, Sovik Roy · 0 citations

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.