The rapid commercialization of generative artificial intelligence (AI), along with the maturation of quantum technologies has raised a question: can quantum-powered neural networks become the next major shift in large language model (LLM) technology? This naturally leads to another misconception that quantum systems will replace classical LLMs. In this study, both architectures are compared in a contrastive manner in terms of mathematics. The data reveals that identical dynamics that help classical systems learn natural language distributions constrain its ability to use efficient sampling of quantum-mechanical spaces. Performing complexity-theoretic separations (i.e., the widely believed but unproven conjecture that BPP ⊆ BQP) and a 2025 preprint reporting experimental demonstrations of quantum advantage for generative tasks we conclude that quantum utility is unlikely to lie in tasks involving natural language processing under current architectures, but rather in certain computational subroutines. We then suggest a hybrid quantum-classical architecture as the best direction to take in the future, as it has the advantages of both paradigms. This is done by studying a case study that optimizes retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) pipelines with Grover's search algorithm.
Diljot Singh, O. J, Smrithy G. S.· Frontiers in Artificial Inte...· 0 citations
Introduction In recent years, high-dimensional clinical and genomic data have gained significant importance for prognosis and personalized medicine in breast cancer. But the use of quantum machine learning (QML) on such data is limited by the availability of few qubits, the computation time of quantum simulation, and dimensionality reduction. This work systematically compares several QML architectures for breast cancer classification in the presence of realistic and simulator constraints. Methods The experiments were performed on a dataset of METABRIC breast cancer patients (2,509 patients). After handling missing values and one-hot encoding, there were 63 features in the processed data set. The feature space was reduced by Principal Component Analysis (PCA) to 12, 4 and 2 components for the implementations of quantum computers, respectively, with 56.10 ± 0.14%, 26.78 ± 0.57% and 16.23 ± 0.33% of the variance retained. Three QML models were tested: Quantum Neural Networks (QNN), Quantum K-Nearest Neighbors (QKNN), and Quantum Support Vector Machines (QSVM), with the models being simulated. Seven classical classification models were tested: Logistic Regression, SVM with RBF kernel, K-Nearest Neighbors, Random Forest, XGBoost, LightGBM and Multilayer Perceptron, both with PCA-matched and full 63-feature representation. All primary results are reported with 5-fold cross validation. Results Among the evaluated QML architectures, QKNN using 12 principal components achieved the strongest performance, attaining an accuracy of **75.11% ± 3.76%**, an F1-score of **0.7088 ± 0.0433**, and a ROC-AUC of **0.8148 ± 0.0394**. Even though all of the QML models performed significantly poorly in comparison to classical models trained on the entire 63-feature data set, the latter models were able to achieve about **94% accuracy** with XGBoost, Random Forest, and Logistic Regression. The comparison also showed the effect of information loss due to PCA is significant in predictive performance in both classical and quantum models. Discussion The results show that for high dimensional breast cancer data, currently available simulator-based QML models can learn meaningful patterns with limited quantum resources, but are not as effective as powerful classical machine learning models when complete feature representations are available. The study does not report any sort of quantum advantage or clinical use, but rather a benchmark of current QML architectures that has been rigorously calculated and repeated, with a focus on the impact of dimensionality reduction, validation approaches, and simulator limitations, as well as outlining challenges that need to be overcome prior to practical implementation on real quantum hardware.
Saartak Allena, S. S., Balaji Chandrasekaran· Frontiers in Artificial Inte...· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.
