Author

S. Heisinger

1 paper indexed here

We haven’t gathered this author’s papers yet. Follow them and we’ll fetch their work.

Not the right person? Other researchers publish under this name.

Open access Aug 2026

Multilevel Lumbar CT Attenuation Beyond L1: Comparison with QCT-Derived Volumetric Bone Mineral Density and Prevalent Fragility Fracture Status in a Diagnostic Referral Cohort

Background/Objectives: CT-based trabecular attenuation in Hounsfield units (HU) is used as a surrogate marker of bone quality, but most approaches rely on a single vertebral level, usually L1, where local abnormalities may limit reliability and availability. This study evaluated whether multilevel lumbar, reference-adjusted HU assessment beyond isolated L1 improves the identification of QCT-defined osteoporosis and the discrimination of prevalent fragility fracture status. Methods: Between 2021 and March 2024, 800 patients referred for evaluation of bone mineral density underwent QCT of the lumbar spine with a calibration phantom. Cancellous attenuation was measured in HU at L1–L3 using manually positioned ellipsoid regions of interest, with predefined adjacent levels (T12, L4) substituted when a target vertebra was unsuitable. Single-level HU, the mean multilevel HU value and the lowest valid HU value were compared with QCT-defined osteoporosis and prevalent fragility fracture status (vertebral or sacral) using ROC analyses and pairwise DeLong testing. Results: Mean multilevel HU correlated closely with mean vBMD (Spearman ρ = 0.988; p < 0.001); as both derive from the same acquisition, the same vertebral bodies and the same phantom, this reflects a strong association between two related measurements rather than validation against an independent standard. Osteoporosis was present in 483 patients (60.4%). Mean multilevel HU was associated with osteoporosis with an AUC of 0.996 (95% CI, 0.993–0.998) at an internally derived cut-off of ≤99.6 HU. In the 699 patients with a valid L1 measurement, in whom a paired comparison was possible, mean multilevel HU exceeded isolated L1-HU (0.992; p = 0.0028). For fracture status, the AUC was 0.975 (0.966–0.983) at ≤80.5 HU, without advantage over L1-HU (p = 0.816). A valid value was obtainable in all 800 patients versus 699 (87.4%) with L1 alone. All patients with a fracture had a vBMD below the osteoporosis threshold, so this endpoint is structurally dependent on the densitometric one. Conclusions: Multilevel lumbar HU assessment provides a practical marker of trabecular bone quality beyond isolated L1. Its principal advantage is measurement availability rather than a clinically meaningful gain in discrimination. The reported thresholds are internally derived, cohort- and protocol-specific, and require external validation.

J. R. Andresen, S. Heisinger, T. Haider et al. · 0 citations