Planning trajectories for robot manipulators under kinematic equality constraints restricts feasible motions to a measure-zero submanifold of the configuration space, requiring special algorithmic treatment. A promising strategy is parametrizing the set of feasible configurations using analytic inverse kinematics (IK). Bespoke analytic IK functions can be written to be differentiable, a necessary property for gradient-based trajectory optimization. But the vast majority of IK functions are computed by automated meta-solvers like IKFast, and are difficult to modify for differentiability. We present a new approach for computing gradients of analytic IK parameterizations: we leverage the inverse function theorem to recover the desired gradients from the ordinary forward kinematic Jacobian. Furthermore, we present a least-squares domain extension and an optimization-amenable description of the reachability constraint, which preserves gradient signal outside the reachable workspace. We demonstrate the efficacy of our approach through numerical experiments and downstream tasks, including a hardware demonstration of an RB-Y1 picking up a box and placing it on a table. Project website: https://cohnt.github.io/inverse-function-theorem-parameterization/
Thomas Cohn, Seiji Shaw, Harel Biggie et al.· 0 citations
Action chunking --- the practice of predicting a sequence of actions and executing a prefix open-loop --- has emerged as a key enabler of recent progress in imitation learning for robotic manipulation. However, executing long open-loop prefixes reduces reactivity, limiting policies'ability to correct for errors. Further, the mechanisms underlying these performance benefits remain poorly understood: prior works cite mitigating compounding errors, absorbing inference latency, or smoothing motions, but provide limited controlled evidence or guidance for preserving reactivity. In this work, we argue that long open-loop execution primarily helps short-context policies imitate"non-Markovian demonstrations". Across four simulation and two real-world tasks, we show that expert non-Markovianity strongly shapes the relationship between task success and open-loop execution horizon. Further, we investigate the impact of compounding errors --- the prevailing explanation for long open-loop execution in prior work --- and find that while they matter, expert non-Markovianity has a much stronger impact in our experimental setting. Finally, we show that when policies are provided with a sufficiently long context, open-loop execution is no longer beneficial and the most reactive, closed-loop policies perform best. While imitation learning has seen great success using long open-loop execution, our findings motivate long-context, reactive policies as a more principled and performant paradigm.
Michael Zeng, Abhinav Agarwal, Ajay Bati et al.· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.
