Transmission through temporary groups does not necessarily preserve complete information about the group-size distribution in aggregate epidemic data. We show that, in finite-population SIS and SIR models, the group-size distribution enters the dynamics only through a finite set of moments selected by the order of the nonlinear transmission kernel. Consequently, markedly different distributions can generate identical stochastic dynamics when their relevant moments coincide. This equivalence extends to transient evolution, fluctuations, extinction-time statistics, and final outbreak sizes. In the deterministic limit, the first moment sets the invasion threshold, whereas the second controls the nature of the transition and the emergence of bistability and hysteresis. The two distributions become distinguishable only when a higher-order transmission mechanism activates their first unmatched moment; even a weak additional channel can shift the phase boundary and place the systems in different dynamical regimes. Solutions of the master equation and stochastic simulations support these analytical predictions. These results establish an intrinsic limit on epidemic inference: a single aggregate dynamical protocol can identify only an equivalence class of group-size distributions, rather than uniquely reconstructing the full distribution.
We introduce a majority-rule model in which collective reversal can be activated in highly aligned groups even when a limited number of members dissent. The dissent tolerance $d$ extends the strict-unanimity dynamics by making near-unanimous group compositions eligible for reversal. Mean-field analysis and simulations reveal that this change qualitatively alters the phase structure. Under strict unanimity, a physically accessible transition exists only for $n=3$ and $n=4$. Allowing dissent restores transitions at larger interaction sizes, replacing the fixed interaction-size threshold with an accessibility boundary in the $(n,d)$ plane. When the activation window is sufficiently broad, directional asymmetry can eliminate one of the two ordered attractors through a saddle-node bifurcation, producing a single stable collective state. In the one-sided case, increasing the dissent tolerance can shorten the transient approach to consensus but leaves its leading logarithmic dependence on population size unchanged. Activation selectivity acts as an independent control parameter for collective ordering, bistability, and consensus dynamics.
Roni Muslim, Rinto Anugraha Nqz, Qonuni Gusthaf Haq et al.· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.