Skip to content

Author

Ridwan Kolapo

2 papers indexed here

We haven’t gathered this author’s papers yet. Follow them and we’ll fetch their work.

Not the right person? Other researchers publish under this name.

Review Open access 2026

A Systematic Literature Review on Supervised Machine Learning Techniques for Financial Fraud Detection

Financial transaction fraud is a significant problem in the fields of digital banking, credit card transactions, online payment, and mobile financial services. This study systematically reviewed the existing literature on supervised machine learning techniques used for financial fraud detection. The review included peer-reviewed papers published between 2020 and 2026 and followed the PRISMA framework, with Parsifal used to assist the search management, screening, eligibility assessment, and data extraction. A total of 503 records were obtained from IEEE Xplore, Scopus, Web of Science, ScienceDirect, and ACM Digital Library. After removing 129 duplicates, screening 374 records, and assessing 107 full-text articles, a total of 55 studies were accepted in the final review. The findings indicated that financial fraud detection relied more on supervised learning which was the method of choice, especially in cases where labelled data of fraudulent and legitimate transactions were known. Credit/debit card fraud was the most common form of fraud, contributing to 40 studies (72.7%) of the reviewed literature. Methodologically, ensemble, boosting, and hybrid classifiers were the most common methods, occurring in 17 studies (30.9%), followed by deep/hybrid representation learning in 12 studies (21.8%) and classical supervised machine learning comparisons in 10 studies (18.2%). The review further indicated that the model performance not only depends on the algorithm choice but also on preprocessing, feature selection, class imbalance handling, and evaluation metrics. The most commonly reported metric was accuracy, which occurred in 52 studies (94.5%), whereas recall/sensitivity was present in 50 studies (90.9%), precision was in 48 studies (87.3%), F1-score was in 47 studies (85.5%), ROC-AUC/AUC was in 42 studies (76.4%), and confusion matrix was in 38 studies (69.1%). The study ends by recommending that effective supervised fraud detection is a complete methodological pipeline and not just isolated algorithm comparison.

Blessing Bologi, Ridwan Kolapo, Temitope Olufunmi Atoyebi · 0 citations
Open access Aug 2026

Development of a Random Forest-Based Predictive Model for Polycystic Ovary Syndrome (PCOS) Using SHAP for Explanability

Polycystic Ovary Syndrome (PCOS) is a lead major disorder and primary cause of infertility in women of reproductive age, affecting about 13% of this population globally with over 70% of cases remaining undiagnosed. Early diagnosis is yet challenging, particularly in low-resource settings where ultrasound imaging is inaccessible. This study focuses on leveraging Random Forest (RF) model for PCOS prediction using only clinical and biochemical data, enhanced with Shapley Additive Explanations (SHAP) for model interpretability. A publicly available Kaggle PCOS dataset from 541 women (177 PCOS-positive, 364 negative) across 10 hospitals in Kerala, India, was utilised. A leakage-free preprocessing pipeline applied median and mode imputation before data splitting.

C. Nweke, Prema Kirubakaran, Ridwan Kolapo · 0 citations

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.