Neuroplasticity, the capacity of the nervous system to alter its structure, function and connectivity in response to intrinsic and extrinsic stimuli, has moved from a developmental curiosity to a central organising principle of contemporary neuroscience and a plausible therapeutic target across neurology, psychiatry, pharmacology and rehabilitation medicine. This condensed review synthesises current mechanistic and translational evidence within a single integrated framework. Four interdependent pillars of plasticity are delineated: synaptic modification, comprising long-term potentiation, long term depression, spike-timing dependence, metaplasticity and homeostatic scaling; structural remodelling, comprising spine turnover, dendritic and axonal growth, pruning and activity-dependent myelination; neurogenesis; and system-level functional reorganisation, comprising map plasticity, vicariation and diaschisis. These neuron-centred processes are permitted or constrained by a supporting tissue environment of astrocytes, microglia, oligodendrocytes, extracellular matrix and the neurovascular unit, and converge on a common molecular substrate dominated by calcium-dependent glutamatergic signalling, brain-derived neurotrophic factor-TrkB transduction, transcriptional and epigenetic control, and neurosteroid modulation. Plastic capacity follows a non-monotonic lifespan trajectory, being high and experience expectant during critical periods, progressively gated in adulthood, and attenuated but not abolished in senescence. Critically, plasticity is directionally neutral: identical mechanisms underwrite skill acquisition and recovery on the one hand, and central sensitisation, addiction, dystonia and epileptogenesis on the other. The current interventional armamentarium is appraised, spanning task-specific rehabilitation, aerobic exercise, cognitive and social enrichment, structured psychological techniques including clinical hypnosis, sleep and dietary optimisation, non-invasive and paired neuromodulation, plasticity-promoting pharmacology, brain-computer interfaces and artificial-intelligence-guided personalisation, with the maturity of supporting evidence graded for each. Persistent obstacles include biomarker non equivalence, heterogeneity of dose and timing, short follow-up, and unresolved ethical questions concerning equitable access, neural data privacy and the therapy-enhancement boundary. The decisive translational challenge is no longer whether plasticity can be induced, but whether it can be reliably steered.
Vivek Kumar Patel, Madhuri Dubey, Radhika Patel et al.· Genetics and Molecular Resea...· 0 citations
The addition of cellular imaging to high-speed, single-cell flow cytometry has revolutionized simultaneous immunophenotyping with morphological and spatial insights.
We have pioneered the utilization of imaging-enabled platforms such as the CytPix and FACSDiscover to characterize cell biology. The CytPix combines standard flow cytometry with a 20X equivalent brightfield camera to provide detailed morphological information, while the FACSDiscover enables cellular marker localization using three fluorescence imaging detectors in addition to a full spectral cytometer.
Both platforms process images at ultra-high throughput, with FACSDiscover reaching up to 10,000 cells per second. Imaging-derived features and AI-based analysis provide morphological and spatial information, uncovering insights not possible with traditional flow cytometry. This includes enhanced identification of immune cell subsets with unique functionalities, improved resolution of senescence, and more detailed signaling and metabolic characterization of mitochondrial activity and distribution. Moreover, imaging cytometry allows to characterize immunological synapses, which was previously impossible with flow cytometry.
Current developments include leveraging AI to identify cellular states and activation label-free, simplifying cellular characterization and profiling, and bridging phenotype with mechanism–thereby driving innovation in immune cell research across multiple therapeutic areas.
n/a
Technological Innovations in Immunology (TECH)
Nicola Heller, Viji Premkumar, Nicholas G. Battaglia et al.· Journal of Immunology· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.