Male hypogonadism is associated with metabolic and cardiovascular comorbidities, and emerging evidence implicates testosterone deficiency in immune dysregulation that may elevate cancer risk. To review current evidence on the relationship between male hypogonadism, immune function, and cancer risk, focusing on mechanisms linking testosterone deficiency to immune suppression and oncologic outcomes. PubMed/MEDLINE, Google Scholar, and SciSpace were systematically searched (through April 2026) using predefined search strings. After removal of duplicates (n = 1535 records screened), 156 full-text articles were assessed for eligibility; 20 studies met predefined inclusion criteria (comprising 4 experimental studies, 4 prospective/RCT studies, 7 observational studies, and 5 reviews used as secondary literature) and were included in a narrative synthesis. Testosterone deficiency was consistently associated with elevated IL-6, TNF-α, IL-1β, and CRP, impaired neutrophil maturation, and reduced NK-cell cytotoxicity. Androgen deprivation augmented thymic output and anti-tumor T cell responses in prostate cancer models, yet promoted chronic inflammation in other contexts. Epidemiologically, low testosterone correlated with increased colorectal cancer risk and poorer survival in advanced malignancies; the prostate cancer relationship followed a paradoxical saturation model. The immunological consequences of hypogonadism are context-dependent. Testosterone deficiency drives pro-inflammatory signaling that may promote carcinogenesis, while androgen-mediated immunosuppression can paradoxically impair anti-tumor surveillance. No simple linear relationship exists between hypogonadism and cancer risk via immune suppression. Prospective studies are needed to guide clinical decisions on testosterone replacement therapy in hypogonadal men.
S. La Vignera, R. Condorelli· International Journal of Mol...· 0 citations
Active insulin time is a key modifiable parameter influencing AB delivery and glycemic outcomes, and shorter AIT settings were associated with increased AB administration and improved TIR, whereas glucose target settings had no significant impact on these outcomes.
Giuseppe Papa, R. Cannarella, C. Gusmano et al.· Journal of Diabetes Science...· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.