Erdős asked whether, for every fixed r ≥ 3, there is a constant cr > r−r such that, for every ε > 0, every sufficiently large r-uniform hypergraph on N vertices with at least (1+ε)(N/r)r edges contains a subgraph on m → ∞ vertices with at least crmr edges. We give counterexamples for every r ≥ 16. The base construction is a sequence of explicit 16-uniform hypergraphs Gn whose unnormalized Lagrangians satisfy 16−16(1 + 1/(4(14n)14)) ≤ λ(Gn) ≤ 16−16 + 1/(15! n). Blow-ups give the counterexample for r = 16, and adjoining common vertices to every edge lifts it to all larger uniformities. Thus Problem 1075, as a statement for all r ≥ 3, has a negative answer. The endpoint question remains open for 3 ≤ r ≤ 15, including the case 2/9 for 3-graphs. Concretely: for every γ > r−r there are ε > 0 and arbitrarily large r-uniform hypergraphs H with e(H) ≥ (1+ε)(v(H)/r)r and e(H[S]) < γ|S|r for every nonempty S ⊆ V(H) — a conclusion stronger than the formulation of the problem. Context. With the usual density normalization the threshold (N/r)r corresponds to αr = r!/rr, and Erdős proved that every number in [0, αr) is a jump for r-graphs; Problem 1075 is the endpoint question at αr. Frankl and Rödl disproved the earlier jumping constant conjecture; Frankl, Peng, Rödl and Talbot showed (5/2)r!/rr is a non-jump; Peng gave the lifting theorem to larger uniformities; Yan and Peng brought this to (54/25)r!/rr. Shaw recently proved that 2r!/rr is a non-jump for r ≥ 4 and that no smaller non-jump follows from his finite-pattern formulation of the Frankl–Rödl method; Liu and Mubayi then proved 4/9 is a non-jump for 3-graphs by a construction outside that framework. The construction here is likewise not an instance of Shaw's finite-pattern criterion, since its distinguished links follow a matching and a shifted matching around a cycle and the proof controls the full Lagrangian of a growing sequence, so Shaw's Theorem 4.3 does not apply. Status. Preprint, not yet refereed. As of 5 September 2026, Erdős Problem 1075 is listed as open on erdosproblems.com, with no proof claims submitted. Declaration of generative AI and AI-assisted technologies. GPT-6 Astra was used to generate the mathematical proofs and draft the manuscript. GPT-5.6 Sol and Claude Opus 5 were used only for editorial review of the exposition. GPT-6 Astra was run in a research environment containing earlier results produced by GPT-5.6 Sol and Claude Opus 5, but those earlier results did not contribute to the final mathematical arguments. The author reviewed the final manuscript and takes full responsibility for its content.
For each n, let λn be the Lebesgue function for polynomial interpolation at an arbitrary set of n distinct nodes in [−1, 1]. We prove that there are a fixed point x ∈ (−1, 1) and a constant C such that λn(x) > (2/π) log n − C for infinitely many n, and that lim supn→∞ λn(x) / log n ≥ 2/π for almost every x ∈ (−1, 1). The first conclusion answers the bounded-loss question of Erdős Problem 1132 in the interpretation that the constant may depend on the array and the point; the second answers the almost-everywhere question. Both statements hold for every triangular array of distinct nodes, with no nesting assumption. The first proof combines Tao's local potential estimates with a local Riesz differentiation formula, an energy estimate for nodal derivative jumps, and a second moment argument. The second proof uses positive Cauchy transforms and harmonic measure, and is independent of Tao's local Bernstein theory. Status. Preprint, not yet refereed. As of 5 September 2026, Erdős Problem 1132 is listed as open on erdosproblems.com, with no proof claims submitted. Declaration of generative AI and AI-assisted technologies. GPT-6 Astra was used to generate the mathematical proofs and draft the manuscript. GPT-5.6 Sol and Claude Opus 5 were used for editorial review of the exposition. The author reviewed the final manuscript and takes full responsibility for its content.