Artificial intelligence (AI) agents promise to extend what users can accomplish beyond their existing expertise, but they also raise the risk of producing plausible-looking work that users may struggle to evaluate. We ask how task-relevant expertise and trust in AI shape agent-assisted work. To isolate these factors, w...
Qianou Ma, Pranav Khape, R. Pang et al.· 0 citations
As AI coding agents carry out development tasks with greater autonomy, developers are shifting from direct implementation toward supervising delegated work. Yet existing research offers limited understanding of how developers organize supervisory activities into connected workflows. Drawing on observations and workflow...
It is shown that LLM-as-judge RL induces reward-hacking patterns, and that LLM-as-judge RL detectors can mitigate them during post-training, suggesting that behavioral foundation models require rethinking the LLM training paradigm.
Xuhui Zhou, Weiwei Sun, Weihua Du et al.· arXiv.org· 8 citations· ⚡1
This work proposes test-time adaptation through human-agent interaction (TAHI), which integrates these signals into agent context and weights, and crystallizes each user's training and evaluation criteria via an evolving rubric module.