Large language models often exhibit sycophancy, revising their answers to align with users when users push back. Such answer flips, however, can arise from different causes. One possibility is that the model simply aligns with the user's feedback in order to satisfy them. Another is that the feedback genuinely contains useful evidence, prompting the model to update its answer in a rational way. We distinguish them as Unsupported-Yielding and Rational-Updating. Prior work focuses primarily on suppressing Unsupported-Yielding, while overlooking its effect on Rational-Updating. We address this gap with a two-turn evaluation framework that measures the two behaviors separately. Across representative training-time and inference-time interventions, we find that anti-sycophancy methods often encounter a trade-off in which reducing Unsupported-Yielding can sacrifice Rational-Updating, and vice versa, even when the two objectives are optimized jointly. Mechanistic analysis suggests that the two behaviors share an internal substrate: the MLP neurons and attention heads driving them overlap substantially, and their associated steering directions are positively aligned. We further conduct a preliminary orthogonalized steering exploration, which yields modest, backbone-dependent selectivity gains. Overall, our results suggest that anti-sycophancy should be treated not as a simple suppression problem, but as a selectivity problem, where effective interventions should preserve Rational-Updating while reducing Unsupported-Yielding.
Huanhuan Ma, Henry Peng Zou, Chengze Li et al.· 0 citations
Generalizable dynamic graph anomaly detection (DGAD) enables pretrained detectors to identify anomalies in unseen target domains without costly retraining. However, existing methods often fail for two reasons. First, they mainly rely on domain-agnostic patterns and miss domain-specific patterns that keep evolving. Second, they assume access to the full target domain data, whereas in more practical online test-time adaptation settings, target data arrive sequentially in unlabeled chunks. To address these limitations, we formulate online test-time adaptation for generalizable DGAD and propose OTTA-DGAD. OTTA-DGAD first extracts dynamic prototypes, i.e., evolving representations of normal and anomalous patterns, from temporal ego-graphs and stores them in a memory buffer. The buffer selectively retains general patterns shared across the source domains used for pretraining while incorporating new patterns from the target domain. An anomaly scorer then compares incoming edge representations against these prototypes to identify both general and domain-specific anomalies. During adaptation, OTTA-DGAD updates the memory buffer using reliable pseudo-labels identified through confidence-based detection. It further enriches each target chunk with relevant representations retained from previous chunks, compensating for information loss resulting from the sequential arrival of data. Extensive experiments under strict test-then-adapt OTTA settings demonstrate state-of-the-art performance on ten real-world datasets from diverse domains.
Jialun Zheng, Hanchen Yang, Jiannong Cao et al.· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.
