Differential privacy protects individual voting records by injecting randomness into the published outcome, but this noise can lead to erroneous results when an election is close. We study how precise central differential privacy and local differential privacy can be for common voting rules, including Plurality, Condorcet, Maximin, Plurality with Runoff, and Single Transferable Vote (STV). Our measure of precision is the margin of victory needed for a private mechanism to return the same winner as the non-private rule with high probability. We give private algorithms for publishing the winner and prove upper bounds on the required margin for these algorithms. We also prove lower bounds showing that nontrivial margins are necessary; many of these bounds match the corresponding upper bounds up to logarithmic factors. For STV, an information-theoretic upper bound matches the lower bound, but we prove that this guarantee cannot be achieved in polynomial time unless NP $\subseteq$ BPP. This gives a rare example of a computationally tractable task that becomes intractable when one simultaneously requires differential privacy and utility.
Quentin Hillebrand, Pasin Manurangsi, Vorapong Suppakitpaisarn et al.· 0 citations
We study differentially private (DP) $k$-means and $k$-median clustering in the online streaming setting. In this model, points arrive sequentially, and at each time step, we need to output a set of $k$ centers that optimizes the clustering objective for all points seen so far. We give a generic reduction that transforms the (sensitive) input stream into a private stream, which is a semi-coreset of the input stream. This implies that any (non-private) online clustering algorithm, run as a post-processing step, can achieve good utility for the original clustering objective. Our algorithm matches or improves upon the approximation ratio, space usage, and running time of existing algorithms [Epasto et al., 2026, Dupr\'e la Tour et al., 2024]. A key aspect of our reduction is that it inherits desirable properties of the underlying non-private clustering algorithm, such as consistency [Lattanzi and Vassilvitskii, 2017]--a property not satisfied by previous DP algorithms.
Edith Cohen, Vadym Doroshenko, Badih Ghazi et al.· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.
