Skip to content

Author

P. Keane

We have 6 of 203 papers

We haven’t gathered this author’s papers yet. Follow them and we’ll fetch their work.

Not the right person? Other researchers publish under this name.

Open access Aug 2026

A Comparison of Machine Learning and Human Graders for Glaucoma Diagnosis from Fundus Images for Population Screening.

PURPOSE To compare the accuracy of vertical cup-disc ratios (VCDR), ascertained by machine learning (ML) versus human graders, from fundus images for glaucoma detection. This study utilizes population-based data, with a disease prevalence and case-mix that is closer to a real-world setting than conventional case-contro...

Thomas R. P. Taylor, Justin Khasentino, Robert N. Luben et al. · 1 citation
Preprint Aug 2026

Beyond Natural-Image Foundation Models: Benchmarking Satellite Pretraining for Ophthalmic Image Analysis

Satellite imagery is proposed as a novel pretraining domain for MedVFM development and benchmarking, motivated by its closer visual alignment with medical data and its freedom from the privacy constraints that limit medical datasets.

Lovre Antonio Budimir, Ming Gong, Alyssa Foong Quinney et al. · 0 citations
#small language model Review Sep 2026

Vibe coding for ophthalmologists.

This review examines vibe coding through an ophthalmology-specific lens, identifying where it adds value and how it can be used responsibly, and how it can be used responsibly while preserving safety and accountability.

F. Antaki, Victor C. F. Bellanda, P. Keane et al. · 0 citations
Open access Aug 2026

Developing a scalable pipeline for data extraction from clinical letters through resource-efficient prompt engineering

This work introduces a scalable, resource-efficient, and high-performance information extraction pipeline that leverages large language models (LLMs) to address challenges of free-text clinical records and develops a multi-dimensional assessment for deployment in data extraction tasks.

A. Y. Ong, Quang Nguyen, I. Barai et al. · 1 citation
Open access Jul 2026

Physicians and artificial intelligence diverge in evaluating large language models on real clinical cases.

While AI agents delivered highly efficient, directionally aligned assessments, they did not fully capture the nuances of human clinical judgment and could not substitute for physician-centered evaluation and promise assistive tools that can triage or pre-screen outputs to reduce human burden.

Peilun Shi, Jian Li, Ziqi Yang et al. · 0 citations

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.