Context: Software significantly influences the efficiency with which hardware resources are utilized, yet software energy consumption is seldom treated as a first-class concern in day-to-day development practice. Objective: This study investigates professional developers'attitudes, decision-making, and development practices related to software energy consumption, with particular emphasis on how energy considerations are recognized, assessed, and acted upon during software development. Method: To this end, we conduct an online survey with 134 software developers. Our study combines quantitative analyses with a qualitative open-card sorting of free-text responses to characterize perceptions, practices, and reasoning patterns around energy consumption. Findings: Energy consumption is explicitly considered in only a minority of projects. More commonly, developers influence energy use indirectly by optimizing proxy properties such as execution time and CPU utilization. Responses to scenario-based questions reveal systematic blind spots in this mental model, including cases in which performance improvements increase energy consumption or exhibit no correlation. We also identify organizational disincentives, limited tooling, and educational gaps as major barriers to adoption. Implications: (1) Institutionalize energy-aware approaches through visible flagship deployments that demonstrate value, (2) expand research and education on energy-performance trade-offs, and (3) develop practical, developer-oriented measurement and feedback tools that lower adoption barriers.
Max Weber, Alina Mailach, Florian Sattler et al.· 0 citations
Large language models (LLMs) have become an essential tool for assisting developers, yet we still lack knowledge on ways to effectively support their interactions during development activities. That is, the quality of interactions with a chat-based LLM still strongly depends on how developers phrase prompts and which information they include. Our goal is to evaluate whether interventions into these interactions with LLMs have an effect on software developers---be it harmful or beneficial. To this end, we conducted a four-month longitudinal study with third-semester computer science students working on a full-stack Web development project using chat-based LLMs under three conditions: (1) a \emph{context}-aware group received intent-based conversation augmentation, (2) a \emph{proactive} group received follow-up suggestions and tailored advice, and (3) a \emph{control} group without intervention. Our augmentations are minimal: (i) to reduce confounding factors and (ii) to isolate treatment effects. Analyzing interaction logs and user surveys revealed no major differences in interaction patterns, indicating no detectable harmful effects in the measured outcomes when intervening in interactions. Moreover, we observed trends of increased satisfaction with the \emph{proactive} treatment. The results indicate that even with minimal interventions, dynamic guidance mechanisms for developer-LLM interactions show observable effects, such that more severe augmentations may have the potential to substantially improve developer satisfaction.
Annemarie Wittig, Alina Mailach, Janet Siegmund et al.· 0 citations
