Skip to content

Author

Nagae Mamoru

1 paper indexed here

We haven’t gathered this author’s papers yet. Follow them and we’ll fetch their work.

Not the right person? Other researchers publish under this name.

#explainable ai Open access Sep 2026

How Will AI Change Philosophy? Unresolved Questions Concerning Intelligence, Consciousness, and the Definition of Philosophy

The essence of philosophy lies less in providing answers than in determining what is to count as a question. Some philosophical questions do not arise merely from a lack of knowledge. Pain, death, selfhood, freedom, value, and meaning may emerge as philosophical problems only when a conscious subject encounters reality and experiences a tension between lived experience and the way the world is explained. This paper calls that structure conscious friction. From this perspective, the question of whether AI can replace philosophy cannot be reduced to a comparison of intelligence or answer quality. An AI may reason at a high level, integrate vast literatures, generate objections, analyze concepts, and even formulate new questions. Yet it does not follow that those questions arise from the same source as human philosophical questions. At this point, consciousness becomes a variable. A conscious AI and a non-conscious AI may differ in what they select as a problem, which contradictions they treat as significant, which questions they continue to pursue, and how they reconstruct question-space itself. This may mark a distinctive feature of philosophy in relation to many other disciplines. In the natural sciences, a hypothesis can ultimately be tested against observation and experiment regardless of the source from which it originated. In philosophy, by contrast, the formation of the question itself may constitute an achievement. Philosophy can then turn back upon that question and ask why it arose, which assumptions sustain it, and which concepts make it possible. The problem of AI and philosophy therefore converges on three questions: What is philosophy? What role does consciousness play in the generation of philosophical questions? Does AI possess the source from which such questions arise? The ability of AI to generate philosophical questions is not the same as the capacity to generate them from the same source as humans. The moment we ask about that difference, the problem of AI and philosophy reaches the problem of consciousness. And there, the hard problem still lies in the way.

Nagae Mamoru · 0 citations

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.