Skip to content

Author

Marialisa Motta

We have 2 of 13 papers

We haven’t gathered this author’s papers yet. Follow them and we’ll fetch their work.

Not the right person? Other researchers publish under this name.

Case report Aug 2026

Independent Country Program Review: Panama, 2021-2024

This Independent Country Program Review (ICPR) assesses the relevance, implementation, and contribution of the Inter-American Development Bank Group's (IDB Group) country strategy and program with Panama from June 16, 2021, to June 30, 2024. The review informs the Board of Executive Directors in their consideration of the forthcoming country strategy and provides the Government of Panama and other stakeholders with an independent assessment of the IDB Group's engagement. The ICPR is based on a systematic review of documentation and triangulation with IDB Group specialists and external counterparts. The analysis follows OVE's Implementation Guidelines for Independent Country Program Reviews and examines the relevance of the country strategy, the alignment and feasibility of the country program, its implementation, and its contribution to strategic objectives and expected outcomes. Panama sustained high economic growth driven by the Canal and investment, but faces persistent challenges of inequality, productivity, and access to quality basic services, particularly in rural and indigenous areas. The country strategy defined eight strategic objectives across three priority areas: modernizing public management, improving the delivery of basic services, and reigniting and diversifying productive activity. While generally aligned with national priorities, the strategy showed weaknesses in strategic selectivity, design clarity, monitoring mechanisms, and risk identification, especially regarding institutional quality and productivity constraints. The program comprised 122 sovereign-guaranteed IDB and 38 non-sovereign guaranteed IDB Invest operations totaling US$3.49 billion. Alignment was strong in public management and basic services, but weaker in productive activity. Implementation faced persistent challenges, including ex ante controls by the Comptroller's Office, budget constraints, limited institutional capacity, and pandemic-related disruptions. The program made its strongest contributions to digital transformation of public administration, education quality and relevance, and access to credit for underserved sectors, while contributions to other objectives were limited due to weak alignment, low operational maturity, implementation delays, and insufficient evidence of results. The ICPR concludes that, although the IDB Group's program in Panama was broadly relevant and adaptable, limitations in strategic focus, operational feasibility, and implementation reduced its contribution to several key development challenges. Strengthening strategic selectivity, addressing structural implementation bottlenecks, and improving evidence generation will be critical to enhancing the effectiveness of future country strategies and programs.

Jorge Gallego, Fernando Barbosa, G. Gotz et al. · 0 citations
Case report Jul 2026

IDB Support to Strengthen Public Sector Transparency and Integrity in Latin America and the Caribbean

Corruption imposes significant economic and social costs across Latin America and the Caribbean, undermining investment, weakening public services, and eroding trust in institutions. Transparency and integrity (T&I) reforms are widely recognized as important tools for addressing these challenges. In this evaluation OVE assessed IDB support for strengthening public sector transparency and integrity between 2010 and 2023, examining: (i) how T&I was reflected in corporate, sector, and country strategies; (ii) the relevance of the Bank's interventions in addressing governance and corruption challenges; and (iii) the extent to which operations achieved their intended T&I objectives. The evaluation covered a broad portfolio of sovereign-guaranteed operations and technical cooperation projects and used a mixed-methods approach combining strategy and portfolio reviews, interviews, literature review, and country case studies. Interventions were analyzed under four policy objectives: reducing opportunities for corruption, increasing public oversight, reducing impunity, and changing social norms. The evaluation finds that the IDB progressively strengthened its strategic focus on transparency and integrity and supported a diverse set of interventions across countries and sectors. The Bank's support often responded to country-specific opportunities for reform, including government initiatives, commitments to international standards, and broader governance reform efforts. Evidence suggests that interventions supporting public procurement, financial transparency, identification systems, audit institutions, and comprehensive policy reforms contributed to strengthening transparency and integrity outcomes in a range of country contexts. At the same time, the evaluation identified opportunities to further strengthen the link between strategic priorities and operational engagement and highlighted challenges in measuring results consistently across the portfolio. The evaluation recommends: (i) systematically leveraging opportunities for T&I engagement; (ii) strengthening the connection between strategic priorities and operations; (iii) expanding the evidence base on what approaches are most effective in different contexts; and (iv) improving the measurement and reporting of T&I results.

C. Bouillon, Michelle Infanzón, Ari Rene Marneau Acevedo et al. · 0 citations

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.