1 paper indexed here

We haven’t gathered this author’s papers yet. Follow them and we’ll fetch their work.

Not the right person? Other researchers publish under this name.

Open access Jul 2026

SACF and GILA for in vitro transformation assessment of CRISPR/Cas9-edited cell therapy candidates: a multi-site study.

Tumorigenicity is a key safety concern for CRISPR/Cas9-based gene therapies, yet its assessment remains challenging due to the lack of relevant and sensitive in vivo models. This HESI Global multi-site study evaluated the Soft Agar Colony Formation (SACF) assay and the Growth in Low Attachment (GILA) assay for in vitro transformation testing of CRISPR/Cas9-edited cells as part of tumorigenicity risk assessment. Across four laboratories, MCF10A cells were spiked with varying concentrations of cells carrying a CRISPR/Cas9-mediated knockout of the known tumor suppressor PTPN12 to determine the assays' limit of detection (LOD), robustness and reproducibility. Both assays demonstrated a consistent LOD of 0.8% at most sites, with SACF showing a broader dynamic range and slightly stronger correlation across laboratories. GILA exhibited weaker correlation due to plateauing at high spike-in concentrations (>12.5%), and excluding these conditions improved inter-laboratory correlations. Additionally, the study identified key determinants of assay success, including the selection of appropriate cell lines and lots, and ensuring sufficient recovery time post-thaw. Together, these data establish multi-site reproducibility of SACF and GILA in the MCF10A-PTPN12 model evaluated here and support their use as animal-free, development-stage characterization tools contributing to tumorigenicity evidence generation.

Lena Dorsheimer, J. Ferreira, Bojing Wang et al. · 0 citations