Skip to content

Author

Joshua Steier

1 paper indexed here

We haven’t gathered this author’s papers yet. Follow them and we’ll fetch their work.

Not the right person? Other researchers publish under this name.

Jul 2026

Cofilling Shattering: A Syndrome-Support Hierarchy for Check Erasures

Let $A:\mathbb{F}_2^n\to\mathbb{F}_2^m$ be a binary linear map with fixed coordinate bases, let $C_A=\ker A$, and let $\lambda_A(y)$ be the minimum Hamming weight of a preimage of the syndrome $y$. We define $\operatorname{Shat}_{q,s}(A)$ as the least common check support of a $q$-dimensional syndrome subspace whose every nonzero element has coset-leader weight at least $s$. It therefore distinguishes release of $q$ independent syndromes from release of a subspace with no easy linear combination. Deleting check coordinates $F$ releases $\ker A_{\bar{F}}/\ker A$, canonically isomorphic to $(\operatorname{im} A)[F]$. Finiteness implies $R_q(C_A)\ge \mathsf{N}_2(q,s)$, where $\mathsf{N}_2(q,s)$ is the shortest length of a binary code of dimension $q$ and distance at least $s$; profile-Griesmer bounds independently control common check support. The hierarchy is coordinate-relabeling invariant but can change under a change of check basis. For the pair-repetition code $C_n=\{(x,x):x\in\mathbb{F}_2^n\}$, the standard realization $H_0=[I_n\ I_n]$ has $\operatorname{Shat}_{q,s}(H_0)=\mathsf{N}_2(q,s)$ whenever feasible. For every $q\ge 1$ and $s\ge 2$, with $n=\mathsf{N}_2(q,s)$, a row-equivalent realization of the same code has value $q$. For a simplicial coboundary map $A=\delta_k$, check erasure is top-face erasure and the released quotient is emergent cohomology. At $s=1$ the hierarchy reduces to generalized Hamming weights and is Tutte-determined; for $s\ge 2$, even identical labeled cut codes can have different values.

Joshua Steier · 0 citations

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.