Author

Jose A. Gonzalez-Lopez

View on Semantic Scholar

2 papers indexed here

We haven’t gathered this author’s papers yet. Follow them and we’ll fetch their work.

Not the right person? Other researchers publish under this name.

Jul 2026

Zero-Shot Face-to-Speech Synthesis via Latent Space Adaptation of a Style-Diffusion TTS Model

Zero-shot text-to-speech (TTS) clones a voice from a short audio prompt, but this reliance on reference audio is a barrier when only visual information is available, e.g. for historical figures or video-game characters. In this work, we propose a Face-to-Speech (F2S) framework that predicts a plausible voice from a static facial image. A lightweight Face Adapter, together with soft-tuning of the face encoder's upper blocks, aligns face-recognition features with the style space of a frozen StyleTTS 2 model, kept frozen during training. We evaluate on held-out identities from LRS3, a large-scale audiovisual corpus of English TED-talk videos. The synthesized speech is highly natural (UTMOS 3.7-4.0, matching or exceeding the 3.61 of ground truth), face-to-voice retrieval is consistently above chance, and the generated voice is consistent with the target speaker. Without any retraining, an English-trained adapter also produces fluent Spanish speech, indicating that the face-to-style mapping is largely language-agnostic.

Carlos Muñoz-Romero, Jose A. Gonzalez-Lopez · arXiv.org · 0 citations

Jul 2026

Phoneme- vs. Character-Level Targets and Selective State-Space Models for Intracortical Brain-to-Text

State-of-the-art intracortical brain-to-text systems pair a neural-sequence phone decoder with an external language model. Two design axes remain underexplored: whether selective state-space models (Mamba) improve on recurrent decoders, and how the output target (phonetic vs.\ character) interacts with that choice. On the public Brain-to-Text'25 benchmark, we study a controlled 2x2 grid (GRU vs.\ hybrid Mamba decoder; phonetic vs.\ character targets) trained with a CTC objective under one reproducible protocol. The recurrent baseline remains strongest: the best phonetic GRU reaches 12.62\% PER and 21.19\% WER, while the best textual GRU after LM rescoring reaches 13.39\% CER and 26.28\% WER. The Mamba hybrid is competitive but does not surpass it. Ablations isolate architectural contributions, and error analysis shows representation-dependent failures: articulatory-like phoneme confusions vs.\ lexical and word-boundary errors.

Lucas Zamora Vera, Jose A. Gonzalez-Lopez · arXiv.org · 0 citations