Skip to content

Author

Jing-Lin Xu

2 papers indexed here

We haven’t gathered this author’s papers yet. Follow them and we’ll fetch their work.

Not the right person? Other researchers publish under this name.

Open access Aug 2026

Quality over quantity: rethinking AI for OLED material design

The rapid integration of machine learning (ML) into organic light-emitting diode (OLED) materials design is increasingly constrained by a critical yet under-recognized limitation: the prioritisation of large datasets and complex models at the expense of chemical relevance, physical fidelity, and interpretability. This perspective argues that meaningful progress requires a shift toward a “quality over quantity” framework, prioritising domain-specific molecular representations, physics-informed descriptors, and interpretable models over generic, data-intensive black-box approaches. Emerging evidence substantiates this view. For example, the organic electronic fingerprint (OEFP), designed for conjugated systems, reduces prediction errors by approaching 50% in out-of-distribution tasks compared with conventional descriptors. Similarly, incorporating physically grounded priors, such as triplet excitation energies, bond dissociation energies, and transition dipole moments, improves predictive accuracy while reducing data requirements. In this context, interpretability must be treated as a core design principle rather than a post hoc tool, enabling mechanistic insights that inform rational molecular design. Complementary data-centric approaches, including active learning, transfer learning, and multi-fidelity modelling, further maximize the value of limited high-quality data. By shifting toward chemically informed intelligence and integrating molecular understanding with device and manufacturing constraints, OLED research can develop ML frameworks that are not only predictive but also interpretable and practically transformative for next-generation materials discovery.

Qi Zhu, Jing-Lin Xu, Qiao-Jun Li · 0 citations
#machine learning Preprint Aug 2026

More Data Cannot Break a Symmetry: Identifiability by Design

Unsupervised representational alignment recovers a stimulus-by-stimulus correspondence from geometry alone, but the automorphism group of the stimulus geometry bounds what any such alignment can identify, before data exist. The obvious diagnostic for this degeneracy, the cheapest non-identity relabelling, ranks two published designs in the wrong order, because dense sampling creates near-duplicates whose transposition is nearly free. We turn this known invariance (Demetci et al., 2024) into a design-time diagnostic and intervention. In colour, where candidate geometries have closed form, we show that the failure is structural: sixty-four times the restart budget leaves a symmetric design unmoved while an asymmetric set at the same N recovers every time. Discriminating representational models and recovering a correspondence are essentially uncorrelated objectives (r = -0.02 over 3,000 subsets). Choosing nine colours by this diagnostic alone, without consulting any learned representation, moves all 93 model representations away from the degenerate point and cuts catastrophic alignment failures from 75% to 2% with the models, the layers, N and the solver all held fixed. The same risk arises wherever a regular design meets its candidate geometry's isometry group, including evenly spaced orientations, tones, or motion directions, and the check costs one function call before data collection.

Jing-Lin Xu, Christopher Kanan · 0 citations

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.