Skip to content

Author

Jianyuan Jiang

2 papers indexed here

We haven’t gathered this author’s papers yet. Follow them and we’ll fetch their work.

Not the right person? Other researchers publish under this name.

Open access Jul 2026

An information bottleneck-based optimal transport network for automated diagnosis of spinal diseases.

Spinal diseases are common and widely impactful health issues in modern society. With the advancement of computer vision and medical image analysis, image-based automatic recognition and classification of spinal diseases have become research hotspots. However, existing methods often show limited performance in recognizing spinal diseases from complex or low-quality X-ray images. Their performance is easily affected by noise and exposure variations, leading to the extraction of pseudo-features unrelated to the disease. In addition, discrepancies among data sources and imaging conditions result in poor model generalization, making it difficult to adapt to cross-domain variations in clinical applications. To address these challenges, this study proposes an Information Bottleneck-based Optimal Transport Network (IBOTSpine) for automated diagnosis of spinal diseases. The IBOTSpine model introduces an information bottleneck-constrained feature extraction module that effectively captures disease-relevant structural information while suppressing irrelevant noise. Moreover, by incorporating an optimal transport mechanism, the model learns domain-invariant features, thereby reducing the distribution discrepancy between training and testing data and enhancing robustness and generalization across multi-source datasets. Specifically, the model employs a Swin Transformer as the backbone network and jointly optimizes the information bottleneck and optimal transport losses to achieve synergistic improvement in feature extraction, domain adaptation, and classification performance. Experimental results on real spinal X-ray dataset demonstrate that the proposed model outperforms existing methods in classification accuracy, generalization capability, and feature discriminability, validating its effectiveness and application potential in intelligent spinal image diagnosis.

Minghao Shao, Haocheng Xu, Linli Li et al. · 0 citations
Review Open access Jul 2026

Clavien-Dindo classification in spinal surgery: A narrative review

The standardized reporting of postoperative complications is essential for improving surgical quality and comparing outcomes. However, spinal surgery has historically lacked a universal system and has instead relied on ambiguous terms. This narrative review synthesizes the literature on the adaptation, validation, and application of the therapy-based Clavien-Dindo classification (CDC) and its modified versions in spinal surgery. It focuses on studies across various spinal procedures and patient populations. The evidence shows that adapted CDC systems demonstrate good to excellent inter- and intrarater reliability, particularly for severe complications. These systems also facilitate direct comparison of surgical techniques. Moreover, they reveal strong correlations between complication severity, prolonged hospital stay, and patient factors such as frailty. Nevertheless, key limitations include poor correlation with certain long-term patient-reported outcomes. The CDC cannot capture intraoperative events or the cumulative burden of multiple complications. Subjectivity also exists in grading milder events. Recent spine-specific modifications that improve neurologic deficit assessment have enhanced clinical relevance. Overall, the CDC provides a critical framework for standardizing complication reporting in spinal surgery. Optimal application requires awareness of its limitations. In complex scenarios, the CDC may be applied most effectively as a component within more comprehensive, spine-specific taxonomies that incorporate surgical complexity and structured neurological assessment. The CDC remains a vital tool for improving communication, benchmarking, and ultimately enhancing patient care.

Zhidi Lin, Kaiwen Chen, Chi Sun et al. · 0 citations

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.