Fulek defined the $0$-$1$ matrix \[ L_3=\begin{pmatrix} 1&0&0&1&0\\ 0&0&0&0&1\\ 0&1&1&0&0 \end{pmatrix} \] and asked whether $\text{ex}(n,L_3) = O(n)$. We prove that every $r\times s$ $0$-$1$ matrix avoiding $L_3$ has at most $27r+2s$ $1$ entries. Fulek's general lower bound construction has $6n-8$ $1$ entries, so \[ 6n-8\leq \text{ex}(n,L_3)\leq29n \] for $n\geq5$. The same argument applies to an infinite family. If $Q_{a,b,k,\ell}$ is the light three-row matrix with column word $1^a3^k1^b2^\ell$, where $a,b,\ell\geq1$ and $k\geq2$, then \[ \text{ex}(r,s,Q_{a,b,k,\ell}) \leq\bigl(5(k-1)(4b+1)+a+b+\ell-1\bigr)r+2s. \] This verifies a conjecture of Pettie and Tardos on linear light patterns for an infinite family that includes the previously unresolved weight-five pattern $L_3$. The proof assigns matrix entries to edges of a bar $1$-visibility hypergraph, cuts gaps to control the multiplicity of these edges, and charges the cuts to a noncrossing graph on the rows.
Let $Q$ be a nonzero $s\times t$ $(0,1)$-pattern, and let $m\ge s$ and $n\ge t$. An $m\times n$ matrix is strongly $Q$-forcing if every $1$-entry belongs to an $s\times t$ submatrix equal to $Q$. Let $F^{*}(m,n,Q)$ count these matrices. Put $H=m-s+1$ and $W=n-t+1$. We prove \[ F^{*}(m,n,Q)\ge 2^{HW}. \] Writing $r$ and $c$ for the numbers of nonzero rows and columns of $Q$, equality holds if and only if \[ (H=1\text{ or }r=1)\qquad\text{and}\qquad(W=1\text{ or }c=1). \] Thus the minimum over all nonzero $s\times t$ patterns is $2^{HW}$, attained exactly by singleton patterns when $H,W>1$, and every fixed nonzero pattern has square growth rate $1$. We also refine the count by weight. If $o(Q)$ is the number of $1$-entries of $Q$, then the number of strongly $Q$-forcing matrices at the minimum positive weight $o(Q)$ is $\binom{H+r-1}{r}\binom{W+c-1}{c}$; at every fixed density in $(0,1)$, the logarithmic growth rate is the binary entropy when $m$ and $n$ are comparable. For ordinary forcing, where every $s\times t$ submatrix contains the $1$-entries of $Q$ in their prescribed positions, let $F(m,n,Q)$ be the number of forcing matrices and let $\mathfrak m(m,n,Q)$ be their minimum weight. We prove \[ F(m,n,Q)=2^{mn-\mathfrak m(m,n,Q)} \quad\text{and}\quad 2^{\,mn-\mathfrak m(m,n,Q)+HW} \le F(m,n,Q)F^{*}(m,n,Q) \le 2^{mn}. \] The lower product bound has the same equality cases as the strong-forcing lower bound above, while the upper product bound is attained exactly by singleton patterns. In particular, the product is at least $2$, with equality exactly when $s=m$, $t=n$, and $Q$ is the all-ones pattern.
Lei Cao, Jesse T. Geneson· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.
