PURPOSE
Minimally invasive surgery (MIS) has been adopted for intradural extramedullary (IDEM) tumors resection to reduce access-related morbidity associated with open surgery (OS). Whether these tissue-sparing corridors preserve oncologic adequacy and intradural integrity while improving perioperative efficiency remains uncertain. This study compared MIS and OS for IDEM tumors across morbidity, resection quality, and recovery outcomes.
METHODS
A PRISMA-guided systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted. PubMed, Embase, and CENTRAL were searched to 1st December 2025 for comparative studies of MIS versus OS in adults with IDEM tumors. MIS was performed through tubular retractor or non-tubular mini-open and microsurgical hemilaminectomy corridors. Primary outcomes were overall complications, gross total resection (GTR), operative time, and blood loss. Secondary outcomes included cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leak, wound infection, recurrence, reoperation, instability requiring fusion, and length of stay (LOS). Random-effects meta-analysis using restricted maximum likelihood estimation generated pooled risk ratios (RRs) and mean differences (MDs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Risk of bias was assessed using ROBINS-I and certainty using GRADE.
RESULTS
Twenty retrospective studies comprising 1471 patients (MIS 691; OS 780) with a mean follow-up of 49.7 months were included. MIS was associated with fewer overall complications (6.7% versus 15.9%; RR 0.50, 95% CI 0.33-0.76; P < 0.001). GTR was comparable (93.1% versus 89.3%). MIS reduced operative time (MD - 25.6 min), blood loss (MD - 144.1 mL), and LOS (MD - 72.3 h), with substantial heterogeneity. No significant differences were observed in CSF leak, recurrence, reoperation, and wound infection. Instability requiring fusion was less frequent after MIS but did not reach statistical significance. Tubular MIS demonstrated consistent morbidity reduction than non-tubular approaches.
CONCLUSION
For appropriately selected IDEM tumors, MIS achieves resection durability comparable to OS while reducing perioperative morbidity and recovery burden. These findings support a morphology-contingent, tissue-sparing approach rather than routine maximal exposure.
Shaan Patel, S. Nischal, Gargee Sree Nallanukala et al.· European spine journal· 0 citations
STUDY DESIGN
Systematic review and meta-analysis.
OBJECTIVE
To identify patient-related, operative, radiographic, and bone quality predictive risk factors associated with proximal junctional failure (PJF) following adult spinal deformity (ASD) surgery and evaluate diagnostic performance of opportunistic CT-derived bone quality metrics.
SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA
PJF is a severe complication of ASD correction associated with pain, deformity progression, and reoperation. While numerous risk factors have been proposed, reported associations are inconsistent, and clinical utility of opportunistic bone quality assessment remains uncertain.
METHODS
PubMed, Embase, and CENTRAL were searched from inception to January 2026. Observational studies reporting PJF after ASD surgery with extractable comparative data were included. Random-effects meta-analyses were used. Diagnostic accuracy of Hounsfield unit measurements was summarized using pooled sensitivity, specificity, and area under curve (AUC).
RESULTS
Twenty-eight studies encompassing 4560 patients were included, of whom 1064 (23.3%) developed PJF. Patients with PJF were older (MD 2.59 y, P <0.001) and had worse baseline disability and pain. Binary osteoporosis status was not consistently associated with PJF, though continuous bone measures were predictive, including lower DEXA T-scores (MD -0.55, P <0.001), and CT attenuation at upper instrumented vertebra (MD -28.97 units, P <0.0001) and immediately cranial adjacent vertebra (MD -32.67 units, P <0.0001). Radiographically, PJF was associated with greater preoperative sagittal misalignment, including higher pelvic tilt and sagittal vertical axis, lower lumbar lordosis, and greater pelvic incidence-lumbar lordosis mismatch. Fusion length and upper instrumented level (dichotomized at T10) were not significantly associated with failure. Hounsfield units demonstrated good diagnostic performance (pooled AUC 0.86).
CONCLUSION
PJF after ASD surgery reflects the interaction between sagittal misalignment, correction strategy, and junctional structural capacity. Continuous bone quality measures, particularly opportunistic Hounsfield unit assessment, show potential for risk stratification and may inform targeted preventive strategies in biologically vulnerable patients, pending prospective validation.
Shaan Patel, S. Nischal, Griffin W. White et al.· Spine· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.
