Over the past decades, digitalization has triggered profound changes in nearly all areas of society — not least in language. This article examines how digital forms of communication, social media, artificial intelligence, and computer-mediated interaction influence language use in German-speaking societies. The focus lies on lexical innovations, grammatical processes of change, pragmatic shifts, as well as questions of multilingualism and language change. The analysis draws on relevant work in German linguistics, computational linguistics, and sociolinguistics. The findings show that digitalization gives rise to both linguistic innovations and tendencies toward homogenization, and that in doing so it durably transforms established norms of written language, grammar, and communicative convention.
Irade Ceferova· EuroGlobal Journal of Lingui...· 0 citations
This article classifies selected German loanwords according to their source language and typological features, focusing on English, French, Latin, Slavic, and Turkic influences. Drawing on established frameworks in loanword typology and language-contact theory, the study approaches borrowed vocabulary not as isolated foreign elements but as linguistic evidence of historical contact and cultural exchange. A qualitative, comparative design is used to examine representative loanwords from each source-language group in terms of semantic field, historical period, cultural function, and degree of integration into the German linguistic system. The analysis shows that each donor language contributed to German vocabulary in a distinct way: Latin shaped religious, educational, scientific, and administrative terminology and is very highly integrated; French influenced vocabulary connected with fashion, cuisine, diplomacy, and cultural prestige; English dominates modern fields such as technology, business, media, sport, and youth culture; Slavic languages contributed regional and everyday vocabulary through geographical proximity and settlement history; and Turkic languages, though fewer in number, provided culturally significant terms linked to Ottoman history and Turkish migration. The findings confirm that loanwords should be analysed not only by etymological origin but also by semantic domain, period of borrowing, and level of adaptation, since older borrowings tend to be more fully integrated than recent ones. A source-language classification therefore reveals the historical and social layers of German vocabulary and demonstrates that lexical borrowing is systematically shaped by prestige, contact, and cultural need rather than occurring at random.
