Frame-Level Evaluation in Weakly Supervised Video Anomaly Detection Mostly Measures Video-Level Ranking
Weakly supervised video anomaly detectors are trained with video-level labels but are commonly evaluated as temporal localizers using Micro-AUROC or AP over pooled test frames. Because these metrics compare frames from different videos, a detector can score well by separating videos without accurately ordering moments within them. We exactly decompose Micro-AUROC by video identity into Within-AUROC for temporal ordering within videos and Cross-AUROC for comparisons across videos. Across ShanghaiTech, XD-Violence, and UCF-Crime, only 0.071-0.388% of comparisons between anomalous and normal frames occur within the same video. When both classes remain distributed across V videos, this share decreases as O(1/V), a benchmark property we call temporal dilution. We train anomaly video binary classifiers under the same video-level supervision and repeat each video score across all frames. These video-constant outputs reach 81.40-97.18 Micro-AUROC despite having no within-video variation. Across 72 controlled runs, replacing every frame score with its video mean preserves a median 98.6% of the Micro-AUROC margin above chance. The same empirical pattern holds for author-released outputs and for XD-Violence under its official AP evaluation. A detector can therefore achieve a high pooled score even when it assigns the same score to every moment within each video.