AI-generated image manipulation localization identifies edited pixels, but its OOD performance lags behind image-level detection partly because pixel supervision entangles forensic evidence with dataset-specific mask geometry and semantic boundaries. Extending image-level distribution alignment to localization, we construct COCO-ControlNet with source-image Canny edges and depth maps to align semantics and geometry, improving OOD performance across multiple localizers. Yet tighter Mask-VAE Reconstruction Alignment (Mask-VAE) underperforms COCO-ControlNet, showing that VAE reconstruction artifacts transfer poorly to local diffusion-inpainting artifacts. We also identify \emph{boundary adhesion}, where fine-tuned segmentation models snap predictions to semantic object contours rather than true manipulation boundaries. These findings motivate GAP-SAM, which encodes an image and its frozen VAE reconstruction into a global artifact token and injects it into SAM3's feature pyramid via zero-gated FiLM before pixel decoding. Without prescribing a spatial region, this token modulates dense decoding to preserve localization while suppressing semantic-boundary shortcuts. Across six datasets, GAP-SAM averages 79.8 Pixel-F1, outperforming the strongest prior method by 12.6 points. It also performs best at every tested severity of JPEG compression, Gaussian blur, and resizing.
Haozhen Yan, Siyuan Shan, Zijian Yu et al.· 0 citations
The rapid progress of image generation models calls for AI-generated image (AIGI) detectors that are not only accurate but also explainable and reliable. While MLLM-based detectors can provide natural language explanations, existing methods often generate speculative rationales: they rely on vague or hallucinated artifacts, miss subtle localized flaws from the latest generators, and fail to provide evidence that can be visually verified. We present Defake-o3, an explainable AIGI detector that moves from speculative rationales to verifiable evidence. It combines interactive visual search with verifier-guided evidence alignment: the model iteratively zooms into suspicious regions to inspect fine-grained details, while an Evidence Verifier, trained from human verification annotations, provides reinforcement learning rewards that favor grounded evidence and penalize baseless claims. To support this objective, we construct GroundFake, a dataset designed for grounded explainable detection, with localized bounding-box evidence, human verification based on visual grounding and artifact specificity, corrected reasoning trajectories, and valid/invalid evidence supervision. We further introduce FakeFrontier, an out-of-distribution benchmark built from real images and outputs of 10 recent generators, together with an MLLM-based protocol for evaluating evidence quality and persuasiveness. Experiments on GroundFake, FakeFrontier, and additional out-of-distribution benchmarks show that Defake-o3 improves both detection accuracy and explanation quality, producing more localized, verifiable, and persuasive evidence.
Bowen Deng, Jiahui Zhan, Yikun Ji et al.· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.
