The classical memory-allocation problem captures the task of placing objects of different sizes in memory, while minimizing the so-called memory high-water mark. It has been known since the early 1970s that the optimal competitive ratio for any deterministic online allocator is $\Theta(\log M)$, where $M$ is the volume high-water mark of the underlying request sequence. This paper begins with a simple observation: many real-world allocators seem to bypass the 1971 lower bound by adopting a slightly different model for memory allocation. These allocators use what we call $k$-aggregate request fragmentation, meaning that the memory allocator is permitted to break requests into multiple fragments, so long as the all-time maximum number of simultaneous fragments is at most $k$ times the all-time maximum number of simultaneous requests. We consider the following basic question: Does request fragmentation fundamentally change the problem of memory allocation, and if so, how? Our results come with several surprises. Among these, we find that even using $k = 1 + o(1)$ request fragmentation, the optimal competitive ratio---which was $\Theta(\log M)$ in the classical setting---collapses to $\Theta(\log \log M)$. This result is shown to be tight with matching upper and lower bounds, applying to both deterministic and randomized algorithms.
Michael A. Bender, A. Conway, Martín Farach-Colton et al.· 1 citation
Affine modular linear hashing is one of the simplest classical hash families. For a prime $p>u$, the hash function is obtained by choosing $s,t$ uniformly from $\mathbb{Z}_p$ and mapping each key $x \in \{0,\ldots,u-1\}$ to one of $n$ bins by $h(x) = [(sx+t) \bmod p] \bmod n$. Despite its simplicity, the maximum load of linear hashing remains poorly understood. For $n$ keys hashed into $n$ bins, the best known upper bound is $O((n \log n)^{1/3})$, whereas the best known lower bound is only $\Omega(\log n / \log\log n)$. We prove a lower bound of $\exp(\Omega(\log n / \log\log n))$ for universes of size $n^{1+o(1)}$. Surprisingly, there is a key set for which this load holds not just in expectation, but for every random seed. The proof is driven by two simple reductions: one transfers lower bounds from a real version of linear hashing to modular linear hashing, and the other transfers arithmetic Kakeya constructions to real hashing. We further show that, for sufficiently large $p$, the expected maximum loads in the modular and real settings are essentially the same, giving an alternative route to an $n^{1/3+o(1)}$ upper bound. Finally, we show that any uniform subpolynomial upper bound for either setting would imply a polynomial-length arithmetic Kakeya conjecture and hence the Kakeya conjecture for upper Minkowski dimension.
Ainesh Bakshi, A. Conway, Hanna Komlós et al.· 1 citation
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.
