Skip to content

Author

G. Colditz

2 papers indexed here

We haven’t gathered this author’s papers yet. Follow them and we’ll fetch their work.

Not the right person? Other researchers publish under this name.

Review Open access Aug 2026

Breast Cancer Risk After Benign Breast Disease Among Racially Diverse Women: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

A meta-analysis of the existing literature was conducted to quantify breast cancer risk according to histologic subtype of benign breast disease (BBD) among women of diverse racial and ethnic backgrounds worldwide. PubMed (Medline), EMBASE (Emtree), and other relevant biomedical databases were searched through February 2026 to identify studies reporting the development of subsequent breast cancer in women diagnosed with either nonproliferative disease (NP), proliferative disease without atypia (PDWA), or atypical hyperplasia (AH). Seven studies met the eligibility criteria. Women of Asian ancestry with PDWA or AH had a substantially higher risk of breast cancer than those with NP. Among Black women, breast cancer risk associated with BBD subtypes was comparable to historically reported risks among White women, whereas associations among Hispanic women were less clear due to greater data limitations. The variable BBD-associated breast cancer risk across racial groups warrants confirmation and underscores the need for further investigation of the mechanisms underlying these differences.

A. Koric, Nusrat Preema, A. Anandarajah et al. · 0 citations
Review Open access Aug 2026

Trends in awareness and uptake of genetic testing among the United States population, 2011–2022

While genetic testing (GT) has become more available over the past decade, it is unclear whether public awareness and use have increased proportionally. We aimed to evaluate national trends in GT awareness and usage. We performed a cross-sectional analysis of nationally representative data from the National Cancer Institute’s Health Information National Trends Survey (HINTS). We analyzed survey responses from HINTS 4 Cycle 1–4 (2011–2014), 5 Cycle 1 and 4 (2017, 2020), and 6 (2022). Primary outcomes were overall genetic testing awareness and uptake. Secondary analyses evaluated awareness and uptake of health-related genetic testing (e.g. disease risk, cancer, and carrier testing) among survey cycles in which specific testing modalities were available. Linear regression assessed crude trends and multivariable logistic regression estimated odds ratios (OR). Among 22,256 respondents, overall awareness of GT increased from 36.6% in 2011 to 81.7% in 2022 (trend p < .001). Awareness was lower among individuals who were older (e.g., ref: age 18–34, age 75+: OR 0.53, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.43–0.64), male (ref: female, OR 0.85, CI: 0.77–0.95), non-Hispanic Black (ref: non-Hispanic White, OR 0.63, CI: 0.54–0.74), non-Hispanic Asian (ref: non-Hispanic White, OR 0.38, CI: 0.29–0.48), Hispanic (ref: non-Hispanic White, OR 0.60, CI: 0.52–0.69), with less than a college education (e.g., ref: some college, less than high school: OR 0.60, CI: 0.47–0.77), and with annual household income <$75,000 (e.g., ref: >$75,000, <$20,000: OR 0.49, CI: 0.42–0.59). GT uptake increased from 21.4% in 2020 to 35.6% in 2022 (trend p < .001). GT uptake was lower among individuals who were non-Hispanic Asian (ref: non-Hispanic White, OR 0.60, CI: 0.38–0.96) and had household incomes <$35,000 (e.g., ref: >$75,000, <$20,000: OR 0.68, CI: 0.49–0.94), but higher among those with a personal history of cancer (ref: no cancer history, OR 1.44, CI: 1.07–1.92). Although GT awareness has grown, there are notable gaps across sociodemographic groups. Further study should better characterize factors influencing health-related GT uptake patterns.

A. Naaseh, Mengyao Shi, S. Tohmasi et al. · 0 citations

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.