Skip to content

Author

Eric Jiang

We have 5 of 10 papers

We haven’t gathered this author’s papers yet. Follow them and we’ll fetch their work.

Not the right person? Other researchers publish under this name.

Book Open access Sep 2026

To Keep or Not to Keep: Learning KV Cache Retention in Disaggregated LLM Serving Systems

Disaggregated LLM serving separates prefill and decode into distinct node pools, interposing a network fabric between the moment a key-value (KV) cache is computed and the moment it is consumed. This architectural shift invalidates a core assumption of classical cache policies: that the cost of a miss is simply recomputation on the same device. In disaggregated systems, a miss triggers both recomputation on a prefill node and a network transfer of the resulting KV block to the decode node—costs that differ by an order of magnitude and depend on prefix length, model width, and fabric bandwidth. Meanwhile, admitting a block to the global KV pool requires an additional transfer at compute time, so a poorly chosen keep decision wastes both memory and bandwidth even before reuse occurs. We present KVLearn, a learning-based retention framework that makes keep/evict decisions as first-class cost-optimization choices in disaggregated LLM serving. KVLearn consists of three components: (i) a lightweight Prefix Reuse Predictor (PRP) that estimates reuse probability from structural and temporal prefix features without touching model weights; (ii) a Cost-Aware Retention Score (CARS) that translates reuse probability into a keep/admit signal by accounting for per-block recompute, transfer, and storage costs; and (iii) an Adaptive Threshold Controller (ATC) that adjusts the admission threshold online using closed-loop feedback from observed hit rates and memory pressure. We integrate KVLearn into a globally disaggregated serving topology and evaluate it on both text and multimodal workloads, where image/video-derived tokens create large, expensive-to-recompute KV blocks under heterogeneous reuse distributions. KVLearn reduces end-to-end time-to-first-token (TTFT) by up to 56% vs. No-Cache (recompute-only), up to 38% vs. LRU-Pool, and up to 33% vs. Mooncake-style disaggregated baselines. Inter-node KV transfer volume is cut by up to 53% vs. LRU-Pool. On MM-Session, throughput stays within ~5% of oracle. Our code implementation of KVLearn is available at https://github.com/FastLM/KVLearn.

Dong Liu, Yanxuan Yu, Eric Jiang et al. · 0 citations
#artificial intelligence Preprint Sep 2026

Codebook Agent: Amortized Topology Design for LLM Multi-Agent Systems

Adapting the communication topology of an LLM multi-agent system to each query improves both accuracy and efficiency, yet current designers treat this as conditional graph generation: a variational, autoregressive, or diffusion decoder searches the $N \times N$ adjacency space, and a graph-network proxy trained on utility and a structural cost such as edge count ranks the sampled candidates. We argue that this formulation is misaligned with the problem. Empirically, topologies that survive a reward filter collapse to about six distinct graphs even when the codebook capacity grows from 8 to 64; edge count is negatively correlated with measured token consumption (Pearson $r \approx -0.4$), so sparsifying the graph makes inference more expensive; and a message-passing scorer over agent-profile nodes is adjacency-invariant whenever agents share a profile---the default configuration of published benchmarks---so it cannot rank candidates at all in that regime. These three facts motivate Codebook Agent: a vector-quantized autoencoder compresses successful topologies into a query-independent 16-entry codebook; a reward-weighted MLP maps the query embedding to a distribution over codes; and an MLP proxy that reads the flattened adjacency, regressed on measured utility and per-task normalized token cost, reranks the top decoded candidates in a single batched forward pass. With no iterative search and no message passing at test time, Codebook Agent is the most accurate method on all six benchmarks we compare (84.6 average against 83.0 for the strongest prior designer), emits a topology in 2.4 ms, and uses 21.9--33.2% fewer LLM tokens.

Jin-Xi Yu, Yubei Li, Eric Jiang et al. · 0 citations
#natural language process... Preprint Aug 2026

JPO: Juris Policy Optimization for Structured Legal Reasoning in Criminal Judgment Prediction

Juris Policy Optimization (JPO), a post-training framework for structured legal reasoning in Chinese criminal judgment prediction, is proposed and experiments show that JPO consistently improves both judgment prediction and reasoning quality over supervised fine-tuning and reinforcement learning baselines.

Zhao-Lu Kang, Yan-Tao Liu, Tailong Luo et al. · 1 citation
Jul 2026

Memory as a Controlled Process: Learned Adaptive Memory Management for LLM Agents

This work presents Memory as a Controlled Process (MemCon), a framework that models memory operations as a Markov Decision Process and learns an online policy that adaptively decides when, what, and how much to retrieve, when to inject a distilled plan, and when to consolidate or forget.

Eric Jiang, Zhi Zhang, Yuchen Wu et al. · 1 citation
Review Jul 2026

From Solvers to Research: Large Language Model-Driven Formal Mathematics at the Research Frontier

It is argued that the next leap in AI4Math systems requires a decisive shift from predefined problem-solvers to research agents that can address frontier mathematical challenges with rigorous formal mathematical reasoning, highlighting core limitations of existing systems in serving as mathematical research agents.

E. Jiang, Xiao Liang, Yikai Zhang et al. · 1 citation

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.