Skip to content

Author

Ellen Kuhl

2 papers indexed here

We haven’t gathered this author’s papers yet. Follow them and we’ll fetch their work.

Not the right person? Other researchers publish under this name.

Jul 2026

Neural operators solve inverse problems for constitutive model discovery

Characterizing the mechanical response of materials traditionally requires solving optimization problems in which model parameters are calibrated or trained to minimize the discrepancy between model predictions and experimental data. This process can be computationally expensive and time-consuming. To overcome this limitation, we propose two neural operator architectures that directly map experimentally measured data to the constitutive functions governing the mechanical response of the material: Physics-Augmented Neural Operators (PANO) and Constitutive Artificial Neural Operators (CANO). The proposed neural operators approximate the mapping between the infinite-dimensional input space of full-field displacement measurements and net reaction forces, and the infinite-dimensional output space of hyperelastic strain-energy density functions. The displacement fields are encoded through Laplacian eigenfunctions to obtain discretization-independent and noise-robust predictions. Our framework constrains the output space to physically admissible material models that satisfy fundamental physical requirements by design. The neural operators are trained on simulated data tuples of displacement fields and reaction forces for a range of material models. Once trained, the neural operators enable near-instantaneous material characterization and require only a single forward pass to infer the strain-energy density function from a given experimental dataset. We test the predictive power of the neural operators for unseen data, noisy data, data with missing information, data from different spatial discretizations, and data from geometries of different sizes.

Moritz Flaschel, Burigede Liu, Ellen Kuhl · 1 citation
Preprint Aug 2026

Benchmarking data-driven material models on the classic Treloar dataset

Machine learning is rapidly reshaping constitutive modeling, offers new ways to learn material behavior directly from experimental data, and challenges long-established modeling paradigms. But with a growing number of machine-learning-based approaches available, how do they compare in practice? In this paper, we use the classic experimental data of Treloar to benchmark popular frameworks for hyperelasticity: (Generalized-Invariant) Constitutive Artificial Neural Networks, Physics-Augmented Neural Networks, (Adaptive) Material Fingerprinting, and Efficient Unsupervised Constitutive Law Identification&Discovery. We compare their fitting performance, computational cost, hyperparameter sensitivity, and ease of implementation. Furthermore, we discuss the trade-offs between predictive accuracy and model complexity. The latter is assessed by quantifying both the number of material parameters in the discovered models and the computational time required to evaluate the constitutive model and its derivatives. The results show that all methods can reproduce the benchmark data remarkably well. Rather than identifying a single winner, we highlight the strengths and limitations of each approach and provide practical guidance for their use. The source code for all six methods, including the training and comparison scripts, as well as all results and data used in this study, is publicly available via https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.21915635.

H. Holthusen, Moritz Flaschel, Denisa Martonova et al. · 0 citations

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.