Skip to content

Author

E. Samelson

2 papers indexed here

We haven’t gathered this author’s papers yet. Follow them and we’ll fetch their work.

Not the right person? Other researchers publish under this name.

Review Oct 2026

Underutilization of osteoporosis screening in eligible men: Analysis of the U.S. national ambulatory medical care survey.

BACKGROUND Clinical practice guidelines from the Endocrine Society recommend osteoporosis screening in high-risk men; however, the extent of implementation in clinical practice is unclear. METHODS We conducted a cross-sectional study using data from the National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey (NAMCS) from 2012 to 2019. We evaluated ordering patterns for dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) during primary care visits among patients eligible for screening under the Endocrine Society Clinical Practice Guideline, based on guideline-concordant criteria operationalized using available NAMCS variables. We included men aged≥70 years and women aged≥65 years. Also, men aged 50-69 years and women aged 50-64 years with additional risk factors, such as body mass index<18.5 kg/m2, tobacco use, alcohol use disorder, or glucocorticoid therapy. We excluded visits among patients with osteoporosis. The trend in DXA screening was examined using multivariable, survey-weighted log-binomial regression models, and results are presented as relative risks (RR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) and two-sided p-values. RESULTS We identified 4573 visits for eligible individuals. The median age was 72 years; 61% were women, 74% were non-Hispanic White, and 11% were non-Hispanic Black. The likelihood of DXA ordering was approximately 100 times less likely at visits among men suggested for screening (0.04%; 95% CI 0.00%-0.15%) than among women suggested for screening (5.1%; 95% CI 3.5%-7.1%). We observed no significant change in DXA ordering across survey years (p = 0.48). DXA ordering among women peaked at 6.9% in 2014-2016, while rates among men remained below 0.1%. CONCLUSION DXA ordering during U.S. primary care visits appears markedly low among men at risk for osteoporosis, representing a missed opportunity for early detection and fracture prevention.

Laura Valenzuela-Vallejo, Cancan Zhang, E. Y. Liu et al. · 0 citations
Aug 2026

Type 2 Diabetes and Longitudinal Changes in Cortical and Trabecular Bone Density, Microarchitecture, and Strength: The Framingham Study.

OBJECTIVE To gain insight into higher fracture risk in individuals with type 2 diabetes, we determined the association of type 2 diabetes glycemic status and severity with longitudinal changes in peripheral bone density and microarchitecture. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS We conducted a longitudinal study of 769 participants from the Framingham Study who underwent high-resolution, peripheral, quantitative computed tomography (HR-pQCT) at the tibia and radius, in 2012-2016 and 2021-2023 (mean 8-year follow-up). Linear regression models estimated mean 8-year percent changes in bone measures, across indicators of diabetes severity, adjusting for age, sex, weight, and height. RESULTS The mean age was 67 ± 7 years, and 59% of participants were women. More than half (57%) were normoglycemic (fasting plasma glucose [FPG] <100 mg/dL, not on any treatment), 31% had prediabetes (100 ≤ FPG ≤125 mg/dL), and 12% had type 2 diabetes (FPG >125 mg/dL or on treatment). Adjusted mean percent changes in HR-pQCT bone measures were similar across diabetes severity, including glycemic status, use of diabetes medications, duration of diabetes, and HbA1c. For example, cortical volumetric bone mineral density at the radius changed by -1.50% (95% CI -2.43, -0.56) in type 2 diabetes and -1.96% (-2.53, -1.39), in prediabetes, compared with -2.42% (-2.86, -1.97) in normoglycemia (reference group; all P > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS The magnitude of peripheral bone loss over 8 years did not differ between individuals with type 2 diabetes and those with normoglycemia, suggesting that bone deterioration alone does not explain the higher fracture risk in older adults with type 2 diabetes. Future studies should address other contributors to skeletal fragility.

A. Dufour, M. Bouxsein, Mu-Song Gao et al. · 0 citations

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.