Skip to content

Author

Daeho Lee

We have 2 of 2 papers

We haven’t gathered this author’s papers yet. Follow them and we’ll fetch their work.

Not the right person? Other researchers publish under this name.

Preprint Jul 2026

Testing Unate Distributions

We initiate the study of *unate distributions* over $\{\pm1\}^n$ -- a natural analogue of unate Boolean functions -- by considering two basic testing problems that parallel well-studied questions for monotone distributions: - Uniformity Testing of Unate Distributions: We show that $\widetilde{\Theta}(n^{3/2})$ samples are sufficient and necessary, in contrast to the $\widetilde{\Theta}(n)$ sample complexity of the analogous problem for monotone distributions (Rubinfeld and Servedio, STOC 2005; Adamaszek, Czumaj, and Sohler, SODA 2010). - Unateness Testing of Arbitrary Distributions: We give a tester that uses $\widetilde{O}(n^{3/2})$ conditional samples in the subcube conditional model. On the other hand, every tester that draws conditional samples in a similar fashion, namely from $O(1)$-dimensional subcubes, must have an $\widetilde{\Omega}(n^{2/3})$ complexity. In the same model, the complexity of monotonicity testing was recently shown to be $\widetilde{\Theta}(n)$ (Chakrabarty et al., STOC 2025). Our algorithms for both problems significantly outperform the naive approach of reducing to the monotone case, which would incur $\Omega(n^2)$ sample complexity. Our uniformity tester relies on a subroutine that"weakly"learns the hidden orientations of a unate distribution, together with a new correlation bound for these estimates. Both tools may be of independent interest in studying monotonicity and unateness over $\{\pm1\}^n$.

Daeho Lee, Shivam Nadimpalli, Mingda Qiao et al. · 0 citations
#artificial intelligence Preprint Aug 2026

SESSE: Sketch, Expand, Sort, Summarize, Evaluate -- LLM-as-Judge Evaluation via Structured Decomposition

LLM-as-judge evaluation reduces response quality assessment to a single holistic A/B preference choice, providing no mechanism to isolate which quality dimensions drove the preference or distinguish model errors from genuine label ambiguity. We propose SESSE (Sketch, Expand, Sort, Summarize, Evaluate), a training-free framework that decomposes holistic judgment into structured sub-questions mined directly from the judge's own error cases; requiring no oracle responses, task-specific rubrics, or fine-tuning. On RewardBench (n=1,000), SESSE achieves near-parity with the chain-of-thought baseline and is competitive with RISE-Judge-32B (92.7%), a fine-tuned specialist, while remaining fully training-free. Per-criterion vote evidence provides an interpretable audit trail for diagnosing label ambiguity and judge failure modes unavailable from a single holistic output token.

Daeho Lee, Mihai Delgeanu, Adel Youssef · 0 citations

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.