LLM agents commonly use knowledge-based tools and access their underlying files, databases, and search indexes through tool invocation. This integration improves agents'ability to provide domain-specific services but also introduces the risk of tool-mediated knowledge extraction: source content exposed to an agent for legitimate responses may be progressively recovered from its outputs, enabling reconstruction of the knowledge source behind a target tool. This paper systematically investigates this risk and identifies two challenges introduced by tool invocation: tool-selection uncertainty, where an agent may invoke a competing tool instead of the target tool, and tool-argument compression, where fine-grained query information may be lost when the agent generates tool arguments. To tackle these challenges, we propose ToolSiphon, a query-only extraction attack that introduces two complementary signals: a target-discriminative signal, implemented through Tool Contrastive Analysis, to steer queries toward the target tool; and a response-grounded factual signal, implemented through Evidence Chained Feedback, to mitigate argument compression and progressively expand extraction coverage. Across three types of knowledge-based tools and six domain-specific datasets, ToolSiphon recovers 74.3% of source records on average when coarse-grained information about non-target tools is available, with 83.2% textual recovery and 90.2% semantic similarity. Even without such information, it recovers 66.3% of source records. ToolSiphon also remains effective against representative defenses and on three real-world agent platforms.
Chuanchao Zang, Jianing Wang, Wenyu Chen et al.· 0 citations
Long-term memory is becoming a core capability of LLM agents, enabling personalization and long-horizon interaction. However, memory mechanisms that retain, transform, or expose more information can affect both benign utility and susceptibility to memory poisoning. Existing evaluations typically measure memory utility or attack risk in isolation under fixed configurations, providing limited insight into how stage-specific design choices reshape their trade-off. We present \textsc{MemGauge}, a controllable framework that separately varies writing admission, management policy, and retrieval exposure under matched clean and poisoned conditions. Across 11 LLMs and two long-term memory benchmarks, controlled evaluations reveal three distinct profiles: a threshold-like risk transition during writing, policy-dependent local decoupling during management, and coupled growth of utility and risk during retrieval. We further apply analogous stage-level measurements to four existing memory systems and observe diagnostic associations qualitatively consistent with these profiles. These results show that targeted poisoning risk varies across memory operations and motivate stage-aware evaluation and control of LLM-agent memory.
Chuanchao Zang, Zi-Jian Cao, Xiangtao Meng et al.· 0 citations
The first extraction attack designed for this threat model, SPORE decouples the adversarial command from retrieval anchors by persisting the command in short-term memory and emitting semantically pure anchors in tool responses, demonstrating that memory isolation alone is insufficient and call for reexamining tool-side trust boundaries in agent architectures.
