We introduce BuzzASR, a collection of language-specialized fine-tuned Whisper models adapted for automatic speech recognition (ASR) in 102 languages. Large end-to-end Transformer-based ASR models such as Whisper have revolutionized ASR, but most prominent models are highly multilingual. As a result, these models often perform poorly on languages less well-represented in their training set. While it has long been known that effective language adaptation can be achieved through simple fine-tuning on monolingual data, this strategy has only been applied to a small number of languages. We massively scale up this simple approach to 102 languages covered in the FLEURS dataset, while also implementing a more complex language adaptation strategy that integrates monolingual tokenizer replacement and data augmentation using text-only fine-tuning. BuzzASR models outperform Whisper-large-v3 on 77 out of 102 languages, reducing character error rates (CER) by a factor of over 2.8 on average. Our models achieve state-of-the-art CER among open-source systems on 27 of 102 languages on the combined FLEURS and Common Voice test set. Our tokenizer replacement strategy yields an average 3.3x improvement in compression rate (characters per token) over Whisper's multilingual BPE, with gains of up to 21.7x. We release all models, code, and detailed results: https://lemn-lab.github.io/buzz-asr
Shivam Singh, Aditya Yadavalli, Catherine Arnett et al.· 0 citations
Crosslingual evaluation of language models that enables fair comparisons remains a fundamental challenge in multilingual NLP. Existing studies adopt a variety of downstream tasks and intrinsic metrics with different theoretical justifications, yet there has been little empirical investigation into whether these approaches yield meaningful crosslingual conclusions. We systematically examine crosslingual evaluation approaches using controlled monolingual language models trained on parallel data with varying tokenizer vocabulary sizes and model sizes, and further validate our findings on multilingual LLMs. We further discuss challenges in achieving comparable downstream evaluation across languages. Our results show that several widely used normalized metrics introduce crosslinguistic biases rooted in tokenization, encoding, and orthographic differences. In contrast, sentence-level negative log-likelihood computed over semantically equivalent sequences provides more meaningful and consistent crosslingual comparisons.
It is confirmed that cross-lingual alignment can emerge from the structure of language and the information it carries rather than from joint training, and this points to practical future directions including model stitching, merging, and modular multilingual systems built from monolingual components.
Ej Zhou, Suchir Salhan, Catherine Arnett et al.· 1 citation
This work quantifies cross-lingual skill inconsistency orthogonally from knowledge and general benchmark performance via multilingual self-play, and shows that skill discrepancies are a measurable major roadblock in the development of truly multilingual models.
Bobby Cheng, Adam Gaber, Zhengzhe Liu et al.· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.
