We have 3 of 39 papers
We haven’t gathered this author’s papers yet. Follow them and we’ll fetch their work.
Not the right person? Other researchers publish under this name.
This work introduces VBVR-Pro, a closed-loop testbed that makes native visual reasoning through generation trainable, verifiable, optimizable, and experimentally controllable, and identifies recurring failure modes of the prevalent VLM-as-a-judge paradigm.
LLMs are widely regarded as alien intelligences, systems whose cognitive operations are fundamentally unlike our own. Apparent similarities to human cognition are therefore often seen as the result of anthropomorphic projection. We argue that this framing is mistaken. LLMs clearly differ from humans in important respects, including their physical substrate, learning history, and the environments with which they interact. These differences make it all the more striking that contemporary LLM-based systems converge with human cognition on a number of principles of cognitive organization with longstanding support in cognitive science. We identify structural correspondences across five dimensions: inferential organization, computational architecture, representational structure, prediction-driven learning, and reinforcement-learning-like mechanisms supporting goal-directed action. These correspondences support a broader model of intelligent cognition in which core principles long used to explain human intelligence also characterize contemporary LLM-based systems.
It is shown that LLMs can assess most major forms of psychopathology from mere minutes of audio, and these results support scoring open-ended narratives with LLMs as a scalable, portable method to translate idiographic diagnostic data into standardized psychiatric assessments.
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.
