AI-assisted diagnostic tools typically act as a "second opinion," providing radiologists with a discrete prediction or probability score that can be consulted alongside clinical context. This treats AI as an independent advisor rather than a collaborative partner, leaving its reasoning largely opaque. We explore a complementary approach grounded in human-AI collaboration through visual interpretability. Specifically, we investigate (1) radiologist performance when diagnosing chest X-rays from images alone, and (2) whether deep learning-generated heatmaps can support radiologists during this diagnostic process, rather than merely validating a final answer. We developed an interactive application that enables readers to engage directly with model-generated heatmaps as they form their diagnoses, and conducted a user study to evaluate how this influences diagnostic behaviour and accuracy. Our findings offer new insights into integrating interpretable, spatially grounded AI feedback into radiologist workflows. Code, datasets, and the application can be found at https://github.com/eedack01/heatmap_assisted_diagnosis.
E. Dack, C. Dai, H. Hoppe et al.· medRxiv· 0 citations
EviBack is presented, an evidence- constrained Teacher backoff that supplies auxiliary super- vision to such groups while preserving verifiable Actor re- wards, and separates evidence assessment from answer refine- ment, preventing reference answers from overriding evidence- insufficiency judgments.
Xiao Ma, Zhiquan Hu, Yi Wei et al.· arXiv.org· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.