BACKGROUND
Current artificial intelligence (AI) models for medical imaging predominantly focus on a single imaging modality and a single disease. Attempts to create multimodal and multi-disease models have resulted in inconsistent clinical accuracy. Furthermore, training these models typically requires large, well labelled datasets, which are costly and labour intensive to prepare. We aimed to train and evaluate an AI model that can interpret diverse imaging modalities across specialties while maintaining robust performance within each modality.
METHODS
We developed Multimodal, Multi-Disease Medical Imaging Foundation Model (MerMED-FM), a multi-specialty model trained using self-supervised learning and a memory module. MerMED-FM was pretrained on publicly sourced, unlabelled medical images from 12 specialties and seven imaging modalities: chest x-rays, CT, ultrasound, histopathology, colour fundus photography (CFP), optical coherence tomography (OCT), and dermatoscopy. After pretraining, the model was fine-tuned, validated, and evaluated for the diagnosis of a range of diseases on 26 public datasets and five private datasets comprising radiology, histopathology, and ophthalmology images. MerMED-FM was compared against a general-domain vision foundation model, various specialist single-modality foundation models, and a multispecialty foundation model. Models were fine-tuned using 10%, 30%, 50%, and 100% of data, with primary comparative analyses conducted using a 10% label fraction. The primary outcome was the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC), which was summarised by imaging modality.
FINDINGS
MerMED-FM was trained on around 3·3 million images from 53 publicly available, unlabelled datasets, comprising 713 931 chest x-rays, 292 353 CT slices, 389 885 ultrasound frames, 1 017 712 pathology patches, 333 099 CFP images, 176 719 OCT slices, and 401 059 dermatoscopy images. Strong performance was achieved across all modalities at a label fraction of only 10%, with mean AUROC values of 0·844 for chest x-rays, 0·906 for CT, 0·818 for ultrasound, 0·908 for histopathology, 0·810 for CFP, 0·962 for OCT, and 0·827 for dermatoscopy.
INTERPRETATION
MerMED-FM has the potential to be a highly adaptable, versatile, cross-specialty foundation model that enables robust interpretation of medical imaging across diverse medical disciplines.
FUNDING
National Medical Research Council, Singapore and the Agency for Science, Technology and Research, Singapore.
Yang Zhou, C. Quek, Jun Zhou et al.· The Lancet Digital Health· 1 citation
Clinical feature extraction from pathology reports is challenging because relevant evidence may be distributed across coded and narrative fields and depend on specimen attribution, negation, ancillary findings, and diagnostic context. We retrospectively evaluated the NimbleMind Multi-Agent System (nMAS), a configurable workflow that separates clinician-defined field specifications from extraction models and returns report-level predictions with source-linked evidence. The study included 54 dummy gastric biopsy pathology reports from Singapore and four binary target fields, yielding 216 feature-case decisions. nMAS correctly classified 213 of 216 decisions (98.61\%), and all evidence spans associated with correct predictions occurred verbatim in the corresponding source reports. All three errors occurred in the two context-dependent \textit{H. pylori}-related fields requiring negation handling or diagnostic attribution. A single-model UMA-style comparator produced the similar label-level performance and error pattern. These findings do not demonstrate predictive superiority for the multi-agent architecture.Rather, the contribution of nMAS lies in workflow integration and traceability through configurable field specifications, complexity-based routing, report-level aggregation, and source-text validation within a clinician-reviewable workflow. Larger multi-institutional studies should assess generalizability, semantic evidence quality, adaptation effort, and clinician verification time.
Yufan Wang, Anit Kumar Sahu, Y. Ng et al.· 1 citation
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.