LLMs have demonstrated strong language-learning and human-like response-generation capabilities, and they are increasingly used to support decision-making in high-risk sectors. However, their internal decision processes remain difficult to interpret, and their responses may lack transparency. The literature has explored numerous approaches to address transparency challenges in LLMs, including Neurosymbolic AI (NeSy AI). NeSy AI approaches were primarily developed for conventional neural networks and may not transfer directly to the distinctive characteristics of LLMs. Consequently, there is a limited systematic understanding of how symbolic AI can be effectively integrated into LLMs. This paper aims to address this gap by first reviewing established NeSy AI methods and then proposing a novel taxonomy of symbolic integration in LLMs, along with a roadmap to merge symbolic techniques with LLMs. The taxonomy organises the literature across four dimensions: (1) the stage of LLM development at which symbolic information is integrated; (2) the coupling mechanism; (3) the architectural paradigm; and (4) the algorithm-level or application-level perspective. The review identifies commonly used benchmarks, recent advances and important research gaps, and uses these findings to outline directions for future research. By highlighting the latest developments and notable gaps in the literature, it offers practical insights for implementing frameworks for symbolic integration into LLMs to enhance transparency.
Maneeha Rani, B. K. Mishra, Dhavalkumar Thakker· Information Systems Frontier...· 0 citations
Concept-based explainable artificial intelligence (AI) can make model reasoning more human-understandable, but concept-level outputs are not automatically trustworthy. We introduce ConceptSMILE, a model-agnostic perturbation-based auditing framework for evaluating the reliability of concept-based explanations. Rather than replacing SMILE, ConceptSMILE extends its perturbation-based logic from feature- or region-level attribution to the auditing of human-understandable concept explanations. The framework perturbs input regions, measures concept-response shifts, applies locality weighting, and fits an XGBoost surrogate to approximate local concept behaviour. Reliability is assessed through attribution accuracy, surrogate fidelity, faithfulness, stability, and consistency. We evaluate ConceptSMILE on retinal fundus images by comparing MedSAM-derived visual concepts with VLM-based semantic concepts. Results show that reliability varies across concepts and pathways: MedSAM achieves stronger spatial attribution and the highest surrogate fidelity ($R^2 = 0.8503$, $R_w^2 = 0.8465$), while the VLM pathway shows stronger vessel faithfulness and stronger stability under selected artefact conditions. ConceptSMILE provides an independent audit layer for evaluating the trustworthiness of concept-based XAI.
Mohadeseh Mollapour, K. Aslansefat, Zeinab Dehghani et al.· 0 citations
The results show that effective hierarchical Graph RAG depends not only on graph augmentation, but on constructing, navigating, and weighting the hierarchy, while retrieval quality remains sensitive to clustering and weighting choices.
Maneeha Rani, B. K. Mishra, Dhavalkumar Thakker et al.· Machine Learning: Science an...· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.
