Skip to content

Author

Anubhav Jangra

We have 5 of 22 papers

We haven’t gathered this author’s papers yet. Follow them and we’ll fetch their work.

Not the right person? Other researchers publish under this name.

#natural language process... Preprint Oct 2026

DivAlgo: A systematic evaluation of algorithmic diversity for code generation models

The DivAlgo benchmark is proposed, a large-scale dataset constituting algorithmically diverse solutions to programming problems that is significantly less diverse than human solutions and introduces a lightweight similarity metric to enable large-scale evaluation.

Anubhav Jangra, S. Muresan · 0 citations
#natural language process... Preprint Oct 2026

Fantastic Metrics and How to Find Them: Meta-Evaluating Metrics for Multi-lingual Style-Personalized Generation

Meta-evaluation of text generation metrics and LLM-judges is primarily conducted using metric-human correlations. However, prior work has shown that correlation is not an appropriate estimate of a metric's evaluation capability and can be unstable across evaluation settings, such as different datasets or languages. The...

Anubhav Jangra, Adrian de Wynter · 0 citations
#artificial intelligence Preprint Oct 2026

Evidence-Anchored Overdose Death Prediction from Death Investigation Reports

This work presents an automated framework that classifies suspected overdoses from death investigation reports, while producing supporting explanations guided by expert knowledge, and shows that a pipeline model with explanations grounded in the input death investigation reports outperforms the other settings.

Raavi Gupta, Zi-Qing Yang, Karli R. Hochstatter et al. · 0 citations

Human-Centered Artificial Intelligence Framework for Overdose Mortality Surveillance, New York City, 2022‒2023.

Human-centered artificial intelligence models that identify suspected overdose deaths using narrative reports from medicolegal death investigations and describe ethical considerations for using AI in overdose surveillance are developed and evaluated.

Karli R. Hochstatter, T. Nadel, Raavi Gupta et al. · 0 citations

Evaluating Style-Personalized Text Generation: Challenges and Directions

This work critically examines the effectiveness of the most common metrics used in the field, such as BLEU, embeddings, and LLMs-as-judges, and finds strong evidence that employing ensembles of diverse evaluation metrics consistently outperforms single-evaluator methods.

Anubhav Jangra, Bahareh Sarrafzadeh, Adrian de Wynter et al. · 2 citations

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.