Skip to content

Author

Anil Lal Sadasivan

1 paper indexed here

We haven’t gathered this author’s papers yet. Follow them and we’ll fetch their work.

Not the right person? Other researchers publish under this name.

Open access Jul 2026

A Belief-Driven Hybrid Reinforcement Learning Framework for Decentralized Multi-Robot Navigation Under Partial Observability

Decentralized multi-robot navigation is difficult when robots must act from local observations without centralized coordination or explicit inter-robot communication. A belief-driven hybrid reinforcement learning framework is evaluated for planar multi-robot navigation under partial observability. Each robot builds a compact local state from its position, waypoint target, sector-based proximity readings, and a decaying occupancy belief that summarizes recent obstacle evidence. A Deep Deterministic Policy Gradient (DDPG) actor produces continuous velocity proposals, and a lightweight geometric safety-blending layer combines this command with goal-seeking and reactive avoidance vectors before execution. The simulation was revised to use e-puck-compatible heading-limited forward motion rather than side-slip motion. The framework is intentionally solver-free at runtime and does not introduce online constrained optimization or new communication mechanisms. The evaluation reports a controlled five-seed study using seeds 101–105 and a 10-seed stress suite covering scalability, symmetric crossing, corridor, and dense dynamic-obstacle cases. In the controlled nominal evaluation, full three-robot completion occurred in all five runs, with 100.0% mean success, 142.2 mean steps, and no recorded collision timestep. In the hybrid stress suite, nominal, four-robot swap, five-robot crossing, symmetric-deadlock, and corridor cases achieved full success in all 10 seeds. Dense dynamic obstacles were the main failure case, with 5/10 full-success runs, 5 robot timeouts, and 10.1 mean collision events per run. These results support the feasibility of the hybrid structure in moderate tested conditions while showing that dense moving obstacles remain a practical limitation. Formal safety guarantees, matched benchmark comparisons, physical robot validation, and wider randomization remain areas requiring future work.

V. Malathi, Pramod Sreedharan, Rthuraj Puthiyaveedu Rajesh et al. · 0 citations

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.