Skip to content

Author

Akinkunmi Adio

2 papers indexed here

We haven’t gathered this author’s papers yet. Follow them and we’ll fetch their work.

Not the right person? Other researchers publish under this name.

Open access Aug 2026

Low bone density and post-operative outcomes following revision total shoulder arthroplasty

Background Low bone density (LBD) may increase complication risk following revision total shoulder arthroplasty (rTSA), but the magnitude and time course of this risk in the revision setting have not been well characterized, with few studies reporting short-term or midterm outcomes. This study compared 90-day and 2-year outcomes after rTSA in patients with and without a documented diagnosis of LBD. Methods We performed a retrospective cohort study including patients from January 1, 2005, through February 1, 2024. LBD was defined by a documented diagnosis of osteoporosis or osteopenia (International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision M80, M81, or M85.8) present at the time of the index revision. Adult patients undergoing rTSA with a diagnosis of LBD were matched to patients without such a diagnosis on demographics, comorbidities, and revision indication, so that documented LBD was the only variable differing between cohorts. Ninety-day post-operative outcomes and 2-year surgical outcomes were evaluated. Sub-group analyses assessed outcomes separately for osteoporosis and osteopenia cohorts. Relative risks with 95% confidence intervals were calculated. Results After matching, 1,495 patients per cohort were included. At 90 days, a diagnosis of LBD was associated with higher rates of periprosthetic fracture (7.2% vs. 5.2%; relative risk (RR) 1.37, P = .028) and hospital readmission (24.6% vs. 17.9%; RR 1.38, P < .001). At 2 years, periprosthetic fracture remained significantly higher in the LBD cohort (11.2% vs. 8.7%; RR 1.29, P = .021), while mechanical loosening, dislocation, periprosthetic joint infection, and re-revision were not significantly different. In the osteoporosis sub-group (n = 963 per cohort), osteoporosis was associated with increased 2-year periprosthetic fracture risk (12.5% vs. 9.0%; RR 1.38, P = .015). The osteopenia sub-group (n = 640 per cohort) did not demonstrate a significant difference (9.8% vs. 8.9%; RR 1.11, P = .565). Conclusion A documented diagnosis of LBD is associated with higher rates of periprosthetic fracture following rTSA. Sub-group analysis suggests that this association is primarily driven by patients with osteoporosis, whereas osteopenia alone was not associated with increased fracture risk. These findings highlight the importance of bone health characterization when evaluating risk profiles in patients undergoing rTSA.

Akinkunmi Adio, M. H. Ilyas, C. Issa et al. · 0 citations
Open access Aug 2026

Osteoporosis Increases the Risk of Periprosthetic Fracture and Loosening after Total Elbow Arthroplasty: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

Introduction Osteoporosis may adversely affect implant fixation and bone integrity following total elbow arthroplasty (TEA), yet its impact on postoperative complications remains incompletely defined. This study compared outcomes following TEA in patients with and without osteoporosis. Methods A retrospective analysis was performed including 1,410 adult patients who underwent total elbow arthroplasty (TEA) with a minimum follow-up of two years. Patients with osteoporosis were matched to an equal number of patients without osteoporosis based on demographics, comorbidities, surgical indication, and preoperative inflammatory laboratory markers. Outcome measures included two-year rates of revision, periprosthetic fracture, implant loosening, prosthetic joint infection (PJI), ulnar nerve injury, and instability. A secondary analysis of 520 patients with osteoporosis compared those who received anti-osteoporosis medication to those who did not. Complication rates were compared between groups using chi-squared testing. Results Patients with osteoporosis had higher two-year rates of periprosthetic fracture (4.4% vs. 1.4%, p<0.001) and implant loosening (5.0% vs. 2.3%, p=0.007). There were no differences in revision (p=0.144), PJI (p=0.479), ulnar nerve injury (p=0.228), or instability (p=0.692). Among patients with osteoporosis, medication use was not associated with differences in revision, implant loosening, PJI, or ulnar nerve injury. Patients on medication had a lower rate of periprosthetic fracture that did not reach significance (p=0.061). Conclusion Osteoporosis is associated with increased risk of periprosthetic fracture and implant loosening following TEA. These findings suggest that impaired bone quality may contribute to structural modes of failure, highlighting the importance of preoperative bone health optimization in patients undergoing TEA.

Akinkunmi Adio, M. Daher, J. Alsamhori et al. · 0 citations

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.