Skip to content

Author

Ajinkya Gaikwad

2 papers indexed here

We haven’t gathered this author’s papers yet. Follow them and we’ll fetch their work.

Not the right person? Other researchers publish under this name.

Preprint Sep 2026

Kernelization of 2-Club Cluster Edge Deletion on Interval Graphs

The \emph{$s$-Club Cluster Edge Deletion} problem asks whether, given a graph $G$ and an integer $k$, one can delete at most $k$ edges so that every remaining connected component has diameter at most~$s$. This generalizes the classical \emph{Cluster Edge Deletion} problem by permitting components of bounded diameter instead of requiring cliques. On general graphs, $2$-Club Cluster Edge Deletion is known to be fixed-parameter tractable when parameterized by $k$, but it remains open whether it admits a polynomial kernel, as posed in~\cite{ABUKHZAM2023113864}. Motivated by this question, we study the problem on interval graphs and obtain a polynomial vertex kernel of size $\mathcal{O}(k^{5})$. As a complementary result, we also show that the \emph{$s$-Club Cluster Edge Deletion} problem is polynomial time solvable on unit interval graphs. We also show that $2$-Club Cluster Edge Deletion is NP-hard even on split graphs.

Ajinkya Gaikwad · 0 citations
Preprint Aug 2026

Parameterized Complexity of Connected Network Microaggregation: The Role of Cluster Size

Network microaggregation is a fundamental technique in statistical disclosure control, where vertices of a graph are partitioned into clusters satisfying size constraints and admitting a center within bounded distance. We study the parameterized complexity of the \emph{unweighted Connected Network Microaggregation} problem, focusing on structural parameters and natural clustering parameters such as the distance bound $d$ and cluster size gap $u-\ell$. We show that, unlike the weighted variant, the unweighted connected problem is fixed-parameter tractable when parameterized by neighborhood diversity, and hence by vertex cover. In contrast, it remains $\mathrm{W[1]}$-hard for more general structural parameters, including vertex deletion to paths, stars, and cliques. These hardness results hold even for every $d\ge 2$ and any fixed gap $u-\ell$, showing that these clustering parameters do not overcome the structural hardness. We further show that adding the cluster size bound $u$ restores tractability for structural parameters such as treewidth and cluster vertex deletion. Moreover, $u$ is essential: the problem remains $\mathrm{W[1]}$-hard when these structural parameters are considered alone. For kernelization, we prove that the problem has no polynomial kernel parameterized by vertex cover unless $\mathrm{coNP}\subseteq\mathrm{NP/poly}$, even when the distance constraint is vacuous. Adding $u$ yields a polynomial kernel for vertex cover, while kernelization remains unlikely for more general structural parameters even when combined with $u$. Finally, we show that the problem is NP-hard on graphs of bounded clique-width.

Ajinkya Gaikwad, Dusan Knop, T. Valla · 0 citations

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.