The intersection between corporate entities and political institutions—commonly referred to as corporate political connections (CPCs)—significantly influences firms' strategic conduct and their environmental obligations. Although academic interest in this area has grown, the ethical dimensions of CPCs in relation to environmental sustainability remain insufficiently developed and conceptually fragmented. This paper delivers a systematic literature review (SLR) of 72 scholarly articles to investigate how CPCs shape firms' environmental outcomes across two analytically distinct dimensions: environmental
performance
, capturing what firms
do
in terms of green innovation, emissions reduction, and pollution control, and environmental
disclosure
, capturing what firms
report
, including the extent, quality, and credibility of their sustainability communications. The review uncovers a marked increase in publications over recent years, with a strong empirical focus on China and the United States, and theoretical grounding predominantly in institutional and resource‐based perspectives. Research to date has primarily examined individual‐level connections, such as politically affiliated executives, whereas broader organizational political behaviors, including lobbying, political financing, and embedded political mechanisms, have received limited scrutiny. Importantly, the existing literature has disproportionately focused on environmental performance outcomes, whereas the qualitative dimensions of environmental disclosure, including readability, tone, specificity, and potential greenwashing, remain largely underexplored. This review exposes major conceptual and empirical gaps, advocating for a shift in scholarly focus toward ethical, normative, and governance‐oriented explorations of CPCs. We recommend further inquiry into the ethical risks of CPCs, their role in misleading sustainability practices, and the value of cross‐national institutional comparisons. Integrating ethical analysis into CPC research is vital for promoting responsible political engagement and advancing authentic environmental sustainability.
Ahmed A. Elamer, M. Nasr, Karim Mahran· Business Strategy and the En...· 0 citations
Environmental innovation may either crowd out shareholder payouts through resource reallocation or reinforce them by signalling financial strength. This study examines how environmental innovation shapes dividend policy in Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) markets. Using a panel of 763 firm‐year observations over 2014–2023, we relate a bounded dividend payout ratio to a granular measure of environmental innovation, controlling for corporate governance structures and firm‐level fundamentals. To address unobserved heterogeneity, dividend persistence, and endogeneity concerns, the analysis employs panel regressions with fixed effects, feasible GLS, dynamic system‐GMM, and fractional response models. Across all specifications, environmental innovation is positively and robustly associated with dividend payouts. Economically, a 0.10 increase in environmental innovation corresponds to an approximately 2–2.5 percentage‐point increase in the dividend payout ratio. Leverage is consistently negatively related to payouts, while stronger board monitoring captured by higher female board representation and a greater proportion of non‐executive directors is associated with more conservative dividend policies. The results reveal that in GCC markets, dividends act as a signalling and legitimacy mechanism that enables companies to convert environmental innovation into tangible financial benefits for shareholders rather than withholding distributions. The study adds to the CSR and environmental management literature by documenting this relationship in an emerging‐market context where ownership is concentrated and sustainability regulation is evolving, and by showing how environmental innovation shapes core corporate financial policies. The results also have implications for investors and policymakers, providing a rationale for considering dividend payments as a key channel through which markets value companies' environmental transition efforts.
Mohammed Alnemer, Ahmed A. Elamer· Corporate Social Responsibil...· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.